• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健持续改进的三个成功因素:对改进团队成员报告的分析。

Three success factors for continual improvement in healthcare: an analysis of the reports of improvement team members.

机构信息

Vestre Viken Health Trust Ringerike, Honefoss, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):251-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038604. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038604
PMID:21209149
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of the Breakthrough Series Collaborative are to close the gap between what we know and what we do, and to contribute to continuous quality improvement (CQI) of healthcare through collaborative learning. The improvement efforts are guided by a systematic approach, combining professional and improvement knowledge.

OBJECTIVES

To explore what the improvement teams have learnt from participating in the collaborative and from dealing with promoting and inhibiting factors encountered.

METHOD

Qualitative interviews with 19 team members were conducted in four focus groups, using the Critical Incident Technique. A critical incident is one that makes significant contributions, either positively or negatively, to an activity.

RESULTS

The elements of a culture of improvement are revealed by the critical incidents, and reflect the eight domains of knowledge, as a product of collaborative learning. The improvement knowledge and skills of individuals are important elements, but not enough to achieve sustainable changes. 90% of the material reflects the need for a system of CQI to solve the problems that organisations experience in trying to make lasting improvements.

CONCLUSION

A pattern of three success factors for CQI emerges: (1) continuous and reliable information, including measurement, about best and current practice; (2) engagement of everybody in all phases of the improvement work: the patient and family, the leadership, the professional environment and the staff; and (3) an infrastructure based on improvement knowledge, with multidisciplinary teams, available coaching, learning systems and sustainability systems.

摘要

简介

突破系列协作的目标是缩小我们所知与所为之间的差距,并通过协作学习为医疗保健的持续质量改进(CQI)做出贡献。改进工作以系统的方法为指导,结合专业知识和改进知识。

目的

探讨改进团队从参与协作以及处理遇到的促进和抑制因素中学到了什么。

方法

采用关键事件技术,对 4 个焦点小组中的 19 名团队成员进行了定性访谈。关键事件是指对某项活动产生重大积极或消极贡献的事件。

结果

关键事件揭示了改进文化的要素,反映了协作学习的知识的八个领域。个人的改进知识和技能是重要的要素,但不足以实现可持续的变革。90%的材料反映了需要建立一个 CQI 系统来解决组织在努力实现持久改进时所面临的问题。

结论

出现了 CQI 的三个成功因素模式:(1)关于最佳和当前实践的持续和可靠的信息,包括测量;(2)在改进工作的所有阶段都让每个人参与:患者和家属、领导层、专业环境和员工;(3)基于改进知识的基础设施,拥有多学科团队、可用的指导、学习系统和可持续性系统。

相似文献

1
Three success factors for continual improvement in healthcare: an analysis of the reports of improvement team members.医疗保健持续改进的三个成功因素:对改进团队成员报告的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):251-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038604. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
2
Improving care through collaboration.通过合作改善护理。
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):384-93.
3
Quality improvement for pressure ulcer care in the nursing home setting: the Northeast Pressure Ulcer Project.养老院环境中压疮护理的质量改进:东北压疮项目
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;4(6):291-301. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000094064.06058.74.
4
The continuous quality improvement process in dynamic and rapid change.持续质量改进过程处于动态且快速的变化之中。
Semin Nurse Manag. 1996 Mar;4(1):55-9.
5
Strategies and tools for managing change.管理变革的策略与工具。
J Nurs Adm. 2007 Sep;37(9):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000285138.34247.5b.
6
Creating a culture of improvement: experience of a pediatric cystic fibrosis center.营造持续改进的文化氛围:一家儿科囊性纤维化中心的经验
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Apr-Jun;23(2):115-20; quiz 121-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000313759.33654.00.
7
All inclusive benchmarking.全括式基准测试
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00596.x.
8
A framework for the continual improvement of behavioral healthcare. Part II--Policy for leadership.行为健康护理持续改进框架。第二部分——领导力政策。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):49-55.
9
US organ donation breakthrough collaborative increases organ donation.美国器官捐赠突破性合作组织增加了器官捐赠。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):190-210. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000325044.78904.9b.
10
Development of potentially better practices for the neonatal intensive care unit as a culture of collaboration: communication, accountability, respect, and empowerment.作为一种协作文化,为新生儿重症监护病房开发可能更好的实践方法:沟通、问责、尊重和赋权。
Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 2):e471-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Instructors Experiences with Team Working in Clinical Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.临床教师在临床教育中团队合作的经历:一项描述性定性研究。
J Caring Sci. 2024 Nov 30;13(4):276-285. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33397. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Strengthening Reliability and Sustainability: Integrating Training Within Industry (TWI) in a Quality Improvement Collaborative.加强可靠性与可持续性:在质量改进协作中整合行业内培训(TWI)
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2025 Feb 11;8(1):35-42. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-37. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff.
为一线医护人员制定并试行同伴质量改进指导方案。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 8;14(1):e002967. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967.
4
Understanding and measuring workplace violence in healthcare: a Canadian systematic framework to address a global healthcare phenomenon.理解和衡量医疗保健领域的工作场所暴力:一个应对全球医疗保健现象的加拿大系统框架。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01144-1.
5
A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.医疗保健系统持续质量改进的范围综述:概念化、模型和工具、障碍和促进因素以及影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.
6
What is quality in long covid care? Lessons from a national quality improvement collaborative and multi-site ethnography.长期新冠护理中的质量是什么?来自全国质量改进协作和多地点人种志研究的经验教训。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 15;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03371-6.
7
How do healthcare providers use national audit data for improvement?医疗保健提供者如何利用国家审计数据进行改进?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09334-6.
8
60% Reduction of reoperations and complications for elderly patients with hip fracture through the implementation of a six-item improvement programme.通过实施六项改进计划,老年髋部骨折患者的再手术率和并发症减少了 60%。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001848.
9
Implementing a new emergency medical triage tool in one health region in Norway: some lessons learned.在挪威一个卫生区域实施新的紧急医疗分诊工具:一些经验教训。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001730.
10
Health management information system (HMIS) data verification: A case study in four districts in Rwanda.健康管理信息系统(HMIS)数据验证:卢旺达四个地区的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0235823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235823. eCollection 2020.