Suppr超能文献

俄勒冈实验——医疗补助对临床结果的影响。

The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the imminent expansion of Medicaid coverage for low-income adults, the effects of expanding coverage are unclear. The 2008 Medicaid expansion in Oregon based on lottery drawings from a waiting list provided an opportunity to evaluate these effects.

METHODS

Approximately 2 years after the lottery, we obtained data from 6387 adults who were randomly selected to be able to apply for Medicaid coverage and 5842 adults who were not selected. Measures included blood-pressure, cholesterol, and glycated hemoglobin levels; screening for depression; medication inventories; and self-reported diagnoses, health status, health care utilization, and out-of-pocket spending for such services. We used the random assignment in the lottery to calculate the effect of Medicaid coverage.

RESULTS

We found no significant effect of Medicaid coverage on the prevalence or diagnosis of hypertension or high cholesterol levels or on the use of medication for these conditions. Medicaid coverage significantly increased the probability of a diagnosis of diabetes and the use of diabetes medication, but we observed no significant effect on average glycated hemoglobin levels or on the percentage of participants with levels of 6.5% or higher. Medicaid coverage decreased the probability of a positive screening for depression (-9.15 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -16.70 to -1.60; P=0.02), increased the use of many preventive services, and nearly eliminated catastrophic out-of-pocket medical expenditures.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized, controlled study showed that Medicaid coverage generated no significant improvements in measured physical health outcomes in the first 2 years, but it did increase use of health care services, raise rates of diabetes detection and management, lower rates of depression, and reduce financial strain.

摘要

背景

尽管即将扩大医疗补助计划(Medicaid)对低收入成年人的覆盖范围,但扩大覆盖范围的效果尚不清楚。俄勒冈州 2008 年基于候补名单抽签的 Medicaid 扩张为评估这些影响提供了机会。

方法

在抽签大约两年后,我们从随机选择的 6387 名成年人和未被选中的 5842 名成年人中获得了数据。测量包括血压、胆固醇和糖化血红蛋白水平;抑郁症筛查;药物清单;以及自我报告的诊断、健康状况、医疗保健利用情况和这些服务的自付费用。我们使用抽签中的随机分配来计算 Medicaid 覆盖范围的效果。

结果

我们没有发现 Medicaid 覆盖范围对高血压或高胆固醇水平的患病率或诊断有显著影响,也没有发现对这些疾病药物治疗的使用有显著影响。 Medicaid 覆盖范围显著增加了糖尿病的诊断和糖尿病药物的使用概率,但我们没有观察到糖化血红蛋白水平或有 6.5%或更高水平的参与者比例有显著影响。 Medicaid 覆盖范围降低了抑郁筛查阳性的概率(-9.15 个百分点;95%置信区间,-16.70 至-1.60;P=0.02),增加了许多预防服务的使用,并几乎消除了灾难性的医疗支出自付费用。

结论

这项随机对照研究表明,在最初的 2 年内, Medicaid 覆盖范围没有显著改善测量的身体健康结果,但确实增加了医疗保健服务的使用,提高了糖尿病检测和管理的比例,降低了抑郁症的比例,并减轻了财务压力。

相似文献

1
The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321.
2
Changes in Utilization and Health Among Low-Income Adults After Medicaid Expansion or Expanded Private Insurance.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4419.
6
Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):e143145. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3145. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
Machine learning for detection of heterogeneous effects of Medicaid coverage on depression.
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 8;193(7):951-958. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae008.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent Treatment Landscape of Depression, Suicidality, and Substance Use Disorder in the US.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252647. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2647.
4
Financial Strain and Child Health: Measures and Evidence From a Systematic Literature Review.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Mar 24;4(4):100337. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100337. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Health and aging trajectories: shared and competing risks and resiliencies for chronic diseases associated with aging. A NIH-wide workshop.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 1;13:1462217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1462217. eCollection 2025.
8
Does Medicaid Improve Health?
Am J Public Health. 2025 Jun;115(6):833-834. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308124.
10
Medicaid Expansion Increases Treatment for Patients with Colon Cancer.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 10;17(2):207. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020207.

本文引用的文献

1
THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR.
Q J Econ. 2012 Aug;127(3):1057-1106. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjs020. Epub 2012 May 3.
2
Mortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid expansions.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):1025-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1202099. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD004816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub4.
4
Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD007954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007954.
5
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
7
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
8
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Sep 18;147(6):386-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00178. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验