Faculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 6960, Nijmegen, 6503 GL, The Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 May 1;11:74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-74.
The aim of a rapid response system (RRS) is to improve the timely recognition and treatment of ward patients with deteriorating vital signs The system is based on a set of clinical criteria that are used to assess patient's vital signs on a general ward. Once a patient is evaluated as critical, a medical emergency team is activated to more thoroughly assess the patient's physical condition and to initiate treatment. The medical emergency team included a critical care physician and a critical care nurse.
To assess the effect of an RRS on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Prospective cohort study in surgical patients before and after implementing an RRS. HRQOL was measured using the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) at pre surgery and at 3 and 6 months following surgery.
No statistical significant effects of RRS implementation on the EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS were found. This was also true for the subpopulation of patients with an unplanned intensive care unit admission. Regarding the EQ-5D dimensions, deterioration in the 'mobility' and 'usual activities' dimensions in the post-implementation group was significantly less compared to the pre-implementation group with a respective mean difference of 0.08 (p = 0.03) and 0.09 (p = 0.04) on a three-point scale at 6 months. Lower pre-surgery EQ-5D index and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) scores were significantly associated with lower EQ-5D index scores at 3 and 6 months following surgery.
Implementation of an RRS did not convincingly affect HRQOL following major surgery. We question if HRQOL is an adequate measure to assess the influence of an RRS. Pre-surgery HRQOL- and ASA-PS scores were strongly associated with HRQOL outcomes and may have abated the influence of the RRS implementation.
快速反应系统(RRS)的目的是改善对生命体征恶化的病房患者的及时识别和治疗。该系统基于一组临床标准,用于评估普通病房患者的生命体征。一旦患者被评估为危急状态,医疗急救小组就会被激活,以更彻底地评估患者的身体状况并开始治疗。医疗急救小组包括一名重症监护医生和一名重症监护护士。
评估 RRS 对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响。
在实施 RRS 前后对手术患者进行前瞻性队列研究。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和 EQ 视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)在术前以及术后 3 个月和 6 个月测量 HRQOL。
未发现 RRS 实施对 EQ-5D 指数和 EQ-VAS 的统计学显著影响。对于计划外入住重症监护病房的患者亚组也是如此。关于 EQ-5D 维度,实施后组在“移动性”和“日常活动”维度的恶化程度明显低于实施前组,分别在 6 个月时具有 0.08(p=0.03)和 0.09(p=0.04)的三分制均值差异。术前 EQ-5D 指数较低和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)评分较高与术后 3 个月和 6 个月时 EQ-5D 指数评分较低显著相关。
实施 RRS 并没有令人信服地影响大手术后的 HRQOL。我们质疑 HRQOL 是否是评估 RRS 影响的适当措施。术前 HRQOL 和 ASA-PS 评分与 HRQOL 结果密切相关,可能减轻了 RRS 实施的影响。