Esmonde Lisa, McDonnell Ann, Ball Carol, Waskett Catherine, Morgan Richard, Rashidian Arash, Bray Kate, Adam Sheila, Harvey Sheila
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1713-21. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0380-6. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
We explored the impact of critical care outreach activity on patient and service outcomes and aimed to contribute to developing a typology of critical care outreach services.
Following a sample search of Medline 15 relevant electronic databases were systematically searched from 1996 to 2004. Searches for publications from nine key authors and citations of eight key articles were performed. Hand searches of journals, bibliographies of reports and review articles, and conference abstracts were conducted. Relevant experts were contacted. A further two studies published after the review date were also included. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion, conducted quality assessment and extracted data. Data were synthesised using narrative techniques.
Seventeen papers and six brief reports were selected for inclusion from a list of 1,760 titles. As anticipated with a relatively new service such as critical care outreach, there were few controlled trials. There were two randomised controlled trials, 16 uncontrolled before and after studies, three quasi-experimental studies, one controlled before and after study and one post-only controlled study. The most frequent outcomes measured were mortality, cardiac arrest, unplanned critical care admissions from wards, length of stay, and critical care readmission rates.
Although improvements in patient outcomes were found, the evidence in this review is insufficient to demonstrate this conclusively. The many differences in service delivery do not permit identification of service typology. Our findings point to a need for more comprehensive research of this expanding service in the United Kingdom.
我们探讨了重症监护外展活动对患者及服务结果的影响,旨在为构建重症监护外展服务类型学做出贡献。
在对Medline进行样本检索后,于1996年至2004年对15个相关电子数据库进行了系统检索。对9位主要作者的出版物及8篇关键文章的引用进行了检索。对手工检索期刊、报告和综述文章的参考文献以及会议摘要进行了检索。与相关专家进行了联系。还纳入了综述日期之后发表的另外两项研究。两名评审员评估研究是否纳入、进行质量评估并提取数据。使用叙述性技术对数据进行了综合分析。
从1760篇标题列表中筛选出17篇论文和6篇简短报告纳入研究。正如对重症监护外展这样一项相对较新的服务所预期的那样,对照试验很少。有两项随机对照试验、16项非对照的前后对照研究、三项准实验研究、一项对照前后对照研究和一项仅事后对照研究。最常测量的结果是死亡率、心脏骤停、病房非计划重症监护入院率、住院时间和重症监护再入院率。
尽管发现患者结果有所改善,但本综述中的证据不足以确凿证明这一点。服务提供方面的诸多差异使得无法确定服务类型学。我们的研究结果表明,在英国需要对这项不断扩展的服务进行更全面的研究。