The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Aug;25(8):1325-33. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000598. Epub 2013 May 2.
Physicians often miss diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia and screening measures can be insensitive to very mild impairments. Other cognitive assessments may take too much time or be frustrating to seniors. This study examined the ability of an audio-recorded scale, developed in Australia, to detect MCI or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and compared cognitive domain-specific performance on the audio-recorded scale to in-person battery and common cognitive screens.
Seventy-six patients from the Mount Sinai Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were recruited. Patients were aged 75 years or older, with clinical diagnosis of AD or MCI (n = 51) or normal control (n = 25). Participants underwent in-person neuropsychological testing followed by testing with the audio-recorded cognitive screen (ARCS).
ARCS provided better discrimination between normal and impaired elderly individuals than either the Mini-Mental State Examination or the clock drawing test. The in-person battery and ARCS analogous variables were significantly correlated, most in the 0.4 to 0.7 range, including verbal memory, executive function/attention, naming, and verbal fluency. The area under the curve generated from the receiver operating characteristic curves indicated high and equivalent discrimination for ARCS and the in-person battery (0.972 vs. 0.988; p = 0.23).
The ARCS demonstrated better discrimination between normal controls and those with mild deficits than typical screening measures. Performance on cognitive domains within the ARCS was well correlated with the in-person battery. Completion of the ARCS was accomplished despite mild difficulty hearing the instructions even in very elderly participants, indicating that it may be a useful measure in primary care settings.
医生经常会漏诊轻度认知障碍(MCI)或早期痴呆症,而筛查手段对非常轻微的损伤可能不敏感。其他认知评估可能需要太多时间,或者让老年人感到沮丧。本研究评估了一种在澳大利亚开发的录音量表在检测 MCI 或轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)方面的能力,并比较了录音量表的认知领域特异性表现与面对面测试和常见认知筛查的表现。
从西奈山阿尔茨海默病研究中心招募了 76 名患者。患者年龄在 75 岁及以上,有 AD 或 MCI 的临床诊断(n=51)或正常对照(n=25)。参与者接受了面对面的神经心理测试,然后接受了录音认知测试(ARCS)。
ARCS 比简易精神状态检查或时钟绘制测试能更好地区分正常和受损的老年人。面对面测试和 ARCS 类似变量之间显著相关,大多数在 0.4 到 0.7 之间,包括言语记忆、执行功能/注意力、命名和言语流畅性。接收者操作特征曲线生成的曲线下面积表明 ARCS 和面对面测试的区分度很高且相当(0.972 对 0.988;p=0.23)。
ARCS 对正常对照者和轻度认知障碍者的区分能力优于典型的筛查方法。ARCS 内的认知领域表现与面对面测试高度相关。即使是非常年长的参与者,听力稍差也能完成 ARCS,这表明它可能是初级保健环境中的一种有用的测量工具。