Suppr超能文献

费城简明认知评估量表(PBAC):一种经过验证的痴呆症筛查测量工具。

The Philadelphia Brief Assessment of Cognition (PBAC): a validated screening measure for dementia.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 North 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1314-30. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.631585. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Abstract

The Philadelphia Brief Assessment of the Cognition (PBAC) is a brief dementia-screening instrument. The PBAC assesses five cognitive domains: working memory/executive control; lexical retrieval/language; visuospatial/visuoconstructional operations; verbal/visual episodic memory; and behavior/social comportment. A revised version of the PBAC was administered to 198 participants including patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n=46) and four groups of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes: behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD; n=65), semantic-variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA) (svPPA; n=22), non-fluent/agrammatic-variant PPA (nfaPPA; n=23), and corticobasal syndrome (CBS; n=42), and a group of normal controls (n=15). The total PBAC score was highly correlated with the MMSE. The criterion validity of the PBAC was assessed relative to standard neuropsychological test performance. Using standard neuropsychological test performance as a criterion, the total PBAC score accurately identified the presence and severity of dementia. Intra-class correlations between PBAC subscales and standard neuropsychological tests were highly significant. PBAC subscales demonstrated good clinical utility in distinguishing AD and FTD subtypes using receiver operating characteristic analysis and standard diagnostic performance statistics to determine optimal subscale cut scores. The PBAC is a valid tool and able to assesses differential patterns neuropsychological/behavioral impairment in a broad range of neurodegenerative conditions.

摘要

费城简短认知评估(PBAC)是一种简短的痴呆筛查工具。PBAC 评估五个认知领域:工作记忆/执行控制;词汇检索/语言;视空间/视结构操作;言语/视觉情景记忆;行为/社会行为。对包括阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者(n=46)在内的 198 名参与者和四个额颞叶痴呆(FTD)综合征组的患者进行了修订版 PBAC 测试:行为变异型 FTD(bvFTD;n=65)、语义变异型进行性失语症(PPA)(svPPA;n=22)、非流利/语法障碍型 PPA(nfaPPA;n=23)和皮质基底节综合征(CBS;n=42),以及一组正常对照组(n=15)。PBAC 的总分与 MMSE 高度相关。PBAC 的标准效度是相对于标准神经心理学测试表现来评估的。使用标准神经心理学测试表现作为标准,PBAC 总分准确地确定了痴呆的存在和严重程度。PBAC 子量表与标准神经心理学测试之间的组内相关系数高度显著。使用接收者操作特征分析和标准诊断性能统计数据确定最佳子量表切割分数,PBAC 子量表在区分 AD 和 FTD 亚型方面具有良好的临床实用性。PBAC 是一种有效的工具,能够在广泛的神经退行性疾病中评估神经心理学/行为损伤的差异模式。

相似文献

1
The Philadelphia Brief Assessment of Cognition (PBAC): a validated screening measure for dementia.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1314-30. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.631585. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
3
Philadelphia Brief Assessment of Cognition in healthy and clinical Brazilian sample.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Mar;70(3):175-9. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
7
Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia.
Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):369-75. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252820.81313.9b.
8
The Turkish validity and reliability of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13147. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13147.
9
Neuropsychological decline in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a longitudinal analysis.
Neuropsychology. 2009 May;23(3):337-46. doi: 10.1037/a0014995.
10
Differential linguistic features of verbal fluency in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):669-677. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2060748. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
3
Novel data-driven subtypes and stages of brain atrophy in the ALS-FTD spectrum.
Transl Neurodegener. 2023 Dec 7;12(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40035-023-00389-3.
5
Digital Speech Analysis in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndromes.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(1):33-45. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201132.
6
Social and leisure activity are associated with attenuated cortical loss in behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration.
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102629. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102629. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Automated analysis of lexical features in frontotemporal degeneration.
Cortex. 2021 Apr;137:215-231. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
Automated analysis of lexical features in Frontotemporal Degeneration.
medRxiv. 2020 Nov 4:2020.09.10.20192054. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.10.20192054.
10
Visuospatial performance in patients with statistically-defined mild cognitive impairment.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr;42(3):319-328. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1714550. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary progressive aphasia: clinicopathological correlations.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Feb;6(2):88-97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.216.
2
Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease.
Neurology. 2009 Nov 24;73(21):1738-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47.
3
Leukoaraiosis severity and list-learning in dementia.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Aug;23(6):944-61. doi: 10.1080/13854040802681664.
5
Measuring progression in frontotemporal dementia: implications for therapeutic interventions.
Neurology. 2008 May 27;70(22):2046-52. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313366.76973.8a.
6
Predicting rapid clinical progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(2):170-7. doi: 10.1159/000113014. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
8
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting.
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 May;52(5):329-32. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200508.
9
Cognitive and motor assessment in autopsy-proven corticobasal degeneration.
Neurology. 2007 Apr 17;68(16):1274-83. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000259519.78480.c3.
10
Neuropsychological deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analytic review.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;78(9):917-28. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.100669. Epub 2007 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验