Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: fellow eye comparison.

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes and complications after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the same set of patients.

METHODS

Fifteen patients underwent PK in 1 eye and DSEK in the fellow eye for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy at the Wills Eye Institute from 1993 to 2011.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity in the PK and DSEK groups (0.39 ± 0.39 and 0.23 ± 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively) was statistically significantly better than mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (0.83 ± 0.36 and 0.76 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively) (P < 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively). Mean manifest refraction cylinder was higher in the PK eyes than in the DSEK eyes at 1 year [3.58 ± 1.82 and 1.23 ± 1.63 diopter (D), respectively] and at 2 years of follow-up (3.57 ± 1.81 and 1.05 ± 1.18 D, respectively) (P < 0.001) but was not statistically different at the last visit (3.18 ± 2.67 and 1.5 ± 1.66 D, respectively) (P = 0.052). Mean postoperative follow-up was 101.9 ± 39.5 and 29.9 ± 19.9 months after PK and DSEK, respectively. Most common complications after PK were high astigmatism in 15 eyes, monocular diplopia in 7 eyes, posterior capsule opacity in 6 eyes, and secondary glaucoma and graft rejection episodes in 5 eyes each. After DSEK, secondary glaucoma in 3 eyes and graft rejection in 2 eyes were the most common complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Final visual outcomes were not statistically different between the 2 procedures, but DSEK had early visual stabilization and PK had a more complicated course, with more astigmatism, rejections, suture-related infections, and graft failures.