Suppr超能文献

LIFT 和 BIOLIFT 手术评估:33 例连续患者的初步经验和短期结果。

Appraisal of the LIFT and BIOLIFT procedure: initial experience and short-term outcomes of 33 consecutive patients.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1702-0. Epub 2013 May 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A new sphincter-saving technique known as the LIFT (ligation of intersphincteric tract) procedure has gained growing interest. Use of a bioprosthetic device has also been suggested to augment the LIFT procedure (BIOLIFT). This study evaluates outcomes of patients undergoing LIFT and BIOLIFT for repair of complex anal fistulae.

METHODS

This study is a single-surgeon, single-centre retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Study was conducted at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sydney, Australia, from May 2009 to April 2012. Thirty-three patients were evaluated. Twenty-nine LIFTs and five BIOLIFT procedures were evaluated. Primary success is defined as successful healing from initial procedure while secondary success is successful healing after management of failure or recurrence.

RESULTS

In a cohort of predominantly female (67 %) and 94 % transsphincteric fistulae, primary success was 63 %. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks (6-81 weeks), there were 11 failures and one recurrence. The median time to failure/recurrence was 3 weeks (1-25 weeks). Six patients had a subsequent fistulotomy and three patients had a BIOLIFT for non-successful outcomes. The median follow-up for those with failures/recurrences is 60 weeks (range 20-76 weeks) and secondary success was 88 %. Post-operative anal manometry studies showed a 9 % reduction of resting and 11 % reduction of squeeze pressures but this was not statistically significant. There was also no post-operative incontinence. Anterior fistulas were noted do significantly worse (47%) compared with non-anteriorly located fistulas (84 %; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

LIFT and BIOLIFT procedures can be performed safely and effectively in a technically demanding study cohort of predominantly females with complex fistulas. Anterior fistulas have a higher risk of failure but present early and are amendable to repeat procedures. In particular, fistulotomies are useful in downstaged tracts and performing BIOLIFTs is an alternative in the management of LIFT failures and recurrences.

摘要

目的

一种新的保肛技术,即 LIFT(结扎内括约肌间沟)手术,越来越受到关注。有人建议使用生物假体来增强 LIFT 手术(BIOLIFT)。本研究评估了接受 LIFT 和 BIOLIFT 治疗复杂肛瘘的患者的治疗结果。

方法

这是一项单外科医生、单中心回顾性研究,使用前瞻性收集的数据库。研究于 2009 年 5 月至 2012 年 4 月在澳大利亚悉尼皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院肛肠外科进行。共评估了 33 名患者。其中 29 例行 LIFT,5 例行 BIOLIFT。主要成功定义为初次手术成功愈合,次要成功定义为治疗失败或复发后成功愈合。

结果

在主要为女性(67%)和 94%经括约肌瘘的患者队列中,主要成功率为 63%。在中位随访 20 周(6-81 周)时,有 11 例失败和 1 例复发。失败/复发的中位时间为 3 周(1-25 周)。6 例患者行瘘管切开术,3 例患者行 BIOLIFT 治疗未成功的病例。失败/复发患者的中位随访时间为 60 周(20-76 周),二次成功率为 88%。术后肛门测压研究显示静息压降低 9%,收缩压降低 11%,但无统计学意义。也没有术后失禁。前位瘘的成功率明显较差(47%),而非前位瘘的成功率为 84%(p=0.03)。

结论

在以女性为主、瘘管复杂的技术要求较高的研究队列中,LIFT 和 BIOLIFT 手术可以安全有效地进行。前位瘘的失败风险较高,但早期发现并可通过重复手术进行纠正。特别是,瘘管切开术对于降级的瘘管是有用的,而在 LIFT 失败和复发的治疗中,BIOLIFT 是另一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验