Aix Marseille Université, URMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, INSERM 1095, Marseille, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2182-94. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00492-13. Epub 2013 May 1.
During the past 5 years, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has become a powerful tool for routine identification in many clinical laboratories. We analyzed our 11-year experience in routine identification of clinical isolates (40 months using MALDI-TOF MS and 91 months using conventional phenotypic identification [CPI]). Among the 286,842 clonal isolates, 284,899 isolates of 459 species were identified. The remaining 1,951 isolates were misidentified and required confirmation using a second phenotypic identification for 670 isolates and using a molecular technique for 1,273 isolates of 339 species. MALDI-TOF MS annually identified 112 species, i.e., 36 species/10,000 isolates, compared to 44 species, i.e., 19 species/10,000 isolates, for CPI. Only 50 isolates required second phenotypic identifications during the MALDI-TOF MS period (i.e., 4.5 reidentifications/10,000 isolates) compared with 620 isolates during the CPI period (i.e., 35.2/10,000 isolates). We identified 128 bacterial species rarely reported as human pathogens, including 48 using phenotypic techniques (22 using CPI and 37 using MALDI-TOF MS). Another 75 rare species were identified using molecular methods. MALDI-TOF MS reduced the time required for identification by 55-fold and 169-fold and the cost by 5-fold and 96-fold compared with CPI and gene sequencing, respectively. MALDI-TOF MS was a powerful tool not only for routine bacterial identification but also for identification of rare bacterial species implicated in human infectious diseases. The ability to rapidly identify bacterial species rarely described as pathogens in specific clinical specimens will help us to study the clinical burden resulting from the emergence of these species as human pathogens, and MALDI-TOF MS may be considered an alternative to molecular methods in clinical laboratories.
在过去的 5 年中,基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱(MS)已成为许多临床实验室常规鉴定的有力工具。我们分析了我们在临床分离物常规鉴定方面的 11 年经验(使用 MALDI-TOF MS 进行了 40 个月,使用传统表型鉴定[CPI]进行了 91 个月)。在 286,842 个克隆分离物中,鉴定了 459 个种的 284,899 个分离物。其余 1,951 个分离物被错误鉴定,需要对 670 个分离物进行第二次表型鉴定,对 339 个种的 1,273 个分离物进行分子技术鉴定。MALDI-TOF MS 每年鉴定出 112 个种,即 36 个种/10,000 个分离物,而 CPI 为 44 个种/10,000 个分离物。在 MALDI-TOF MS 期间,只有 50 个分离物需要进行第二次表型鉴定(即 4.5 次重新鉴定/10,000 个分离物),而在 CPI 期间则有 620 个分离物(即 35.2/10,000 个分离物)。我们鉴定了 128 个很少被报道为人类病原体的细菌种,其中 48 个使用表型技术(22 个使用 CPI,37 个使用 MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定。另外 75 个稀有物种使用分子方法鉴定。与 CPI 和基因测序相比,MALDI-TOF MS 将鉴定所需的时间分别减少了 55 倍和 169 倍,成本分别减少了 5 倍和 96 倍。MALDI-TOF MS 不仅是一种强大的细菌常规鉴定工具,也是鉴定与人类传染病有关的稀有细菌种的工具。快速鉴定特定临床标本中很少描述为病原体的细菌种的能力将有助于我们研究这些种作为人类病原体出现所带来的临床负担,并且 MALDI-TOF MS 可以被认为是临床实验室中分子方法的替代方法。