基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱技术在常规临床微生物实验室分离的细菌菌株鉴定中的性能。

Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

机构信息

Institute of Microbiology, University of Lausanne, and University Hospital Center, Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1549-54. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01794-09. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has recently been introduced in diagnostic microbiology laboratories for the identification of bacterial and yeast strains isolated from clinical samples. In the present study, we prospectively compared MALDI-TOF MS to the conventional phenotypic method for the identification of routine isolates. Colonies were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS either by direct deposition on the target plate or after a formic acid-acetonitrile extraction step if no valid result was initially obtained. Among 1,371 isolates identified by conventional methods, 1,278 (93.2%) were putatively identified to the species level by MALDI-TOF MS and 73 (5.3%) were identified to the genus level, but no reliable identification was obtained for 20 (1.5%). Among the 1,278 isolates identified to the species level by MALDI-TOF MS, 63 (4.9%) discordant results were initially identified. Most discordant results (42/63) were due to systematic database-related taxonomical differences, 14 were explained by poor discrimination of the MALDI-TOF MS spectra obtained, and 7 were due to errors in the initial conventional identification. An extraction step was required to obtain a valid MALDI-TOF MS identification for 25.6% of the 1,278 valid isolates. In conclusion, our results show that MALDI-TOF MS is a fast and reliable technique which has the potential to replace conventional phenotypic identification for most bacterial strains routinely isolated in clinical microbiology laboratories.

摘要

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)最近已在诊断微生物学实验室中引入,用于鉴定从临床样本中分离出的细菌和酵母菌株。在本研究中,我们前瞻性地比较了 MALDI-TOF MS 与传统表型方法,用于鉴定常规分离株。将菌落通过 MALDI-TOF MS 直接沉积在靶板上进行分析,或者如果最初未获得有效结果,则通过甲酸-乙腈提取步骤进行分析。在通过传统方法鉴定的 1371 株分离物中,1278 株(93.2%)通过 MALDI-TOF MS 被推测鉴定到种水平,73 株(5.3%)鉴定到属水平,但 20 株(1.5%)未获得可靠鉴定。在通过 MALDI-TOF MS 鉴定到种水平的 1278 株分离物中,最初鉴定有 63 株(4.9%)存在不一致结果。大多数不一致结果(42/63)是由于系统数据库相关的分类学差异所致,14 个结果是由于 MALDI-TOF MS 获得的光谱区分度差解释的,7 个结果是由于初始传统鉴定错误所致。需要提取步骤才能获得 1278 株有效分离物中 25.6%的有效 MALDI-TOF MS 鉴定。总之,我们的结果表明 MALDI-TOF MS 是一种快速可靠的技术,有可能替代临床微生物学实验室中常规分离的大多数细菌菌株的传统表型鉴定。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索