Seng Piseth, Drancourt Michel, Gouriet Frédérique, La Scola Bernard, Fournier Pierre-Edouard, Rolain Jean Marc, Raoult Didier
Pôle des Maladies Infectieuses, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, URMITE, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement 6236, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 15;49(4):543-51. doi: 10.1086/600885.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry accurately identifies both selected bacteria and bacteria in select clinical situations. It has not been evaluated for routine use in the clinic.
We prospectively analyzed routine MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry identification in parallel with conventional phenotypic identification of bacteria regardless of phylum or source of isolation. Discrepancies were resolved by 16S ribosomal RNA and rpoB gene sequence-based molecular identification. Colonies (4 spots per isolate directly deposited on the MALDI-TOF plate) were analyzed using an Autoflex II Bruker Daltonik mass spectrometer. Peptidic spectra were compared with the Bruker BioTyper database, version 2.0, and the identification score was noted. Delays and costs of identification were measured.
Of 1660 bacterial isolates analyzed, 95.4% were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; 84.1% were identified at the species level, and 11.3% were identified at the genus level. In most cases, absence of identification (2.8% of isolates) and erroneous identification (1.7% of isolates) were due to improper database entries. Accurate MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry identification was significantly correlated with having 10 reference spectra in the database (P=.01). The mean time required for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry identification of 1 isolate was 6 minutes for an estimated 22%-32% cost of current methods of identification.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is a cost-effective, accurate method for routine identification of bacterial isolates in <1 h using a database comprising > or =10 reference spectra per bacterial species and a 1.9 identification score (Brucker system). It may replace Gram staining and biochemical identification in the near future.
基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱分析法能在特定临床情况下准确鉴定特定细菌及细菌种类。但尚未对其在临床常规应用进行评估。
我们前瞻性地分析了常规MALDI-TOF质谱分析法鉴定细菌的结果,并与传统的细菌表型鉴定方法进行平行比较,无论细菌所属门类或分离来源如何。通过基于16S核糖体RNA和rpoB基因序列的分子鉴定来解决差异问题。使用Autoflex II布鲁克道尔顿质谱仪分析菌落(每个分离株在MALDI-TOF板上直接点样4个点)。将肽谱与布鲁克生物分型数据库2.0版进行比较,并记录鉴定分数。测定鉴定的延迟时间和成本。
在分析的1660株细菌分离株中,95.4%通过MALDI-TOF质谱分析法得到正确鉴定;84.1%鉴定到种水平,11.3%鉴定到属水平。在大多数情况下,无法鉴定(占分离株的2.8%)和错误鉴定(占分离株的1.7%)是由于数据库录入不当。MALDI-TOF质谱分析法的准确鉴定与数据库中存在10条参考谱显著相关(P = 0.01)。MALDI-TOF质谱分析法鉴定1株细菌的平均时间为6分钟,估计成本为当前鉴定方法的22%-32%。
MALDI-TOF质谱分析法是一种经济高效、准确的方法,可在不到1小时内对细菌分离株进行常规鉴定,使用的数据库中每个细菌种类包含≥10条参考谱且鉴定分数为1.9(布鲁克系统)。在不久的将来,它可能会取代革兰氏染色和生化鉴定。