• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《格罗宁根议定书》与新生儿安乐死:滑坡谬误出现了吗?

The Groningen Protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt?

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):293-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101402.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2013-101402
PMID:23637430
Abstract

In The Netherlands, neonatal euthanasia has become a legal option and the Groningen Protocol contains an approach to identify situations in which neonatal euthanasia might be appropriate. In the 5 years following the publication of the protocol, neither the prediction that this would be the first step on a slippery slope, nor the prediction of complete transparency and legal control became true. Instead, we experienced a transformation of the healthcare system after antenatal screening policy became a part of antenatal care. This resulted in increased terminations of pregnancy and less euthanasia.

摘要

在荷兰,新生儿安乐死已成为一种合法选择,《格罗宁根协议》提出了一种识别新生儿安乐死可能适用的情况的方法。在该协议发布后的 5 年中,既没有出现预测的那样这将是滑坡的第一步,也没有出现完全透明和法律控制的情况。相反,我们经历了产前筛查政策成为产前护理一部分后的医疗保健系统的转变。这导致了更多的终止妊娠和更少的安乐死。

相似文献

1
The Groningen Protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt?《格罗宁根议定书》与新生儿安乐死:滑坡谬误出现了吗?
J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):293-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101402.
2
Death in the Netherlands: evidence and argument.荷兰的死亡情况:证据与论证。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Oct;163(10):958-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.197.
3
Still on the same slope: Groningen breaks no new ethical ground.仍在同一立场上:格罗宁根并未开辟新的伦理领域。
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):67-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513143.
4
Euthanasia in the Netherlands: sliding down the slippery slope?荷兰的安乐死:是否在滑向滑坡?
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 1995;9(2):407-48.
5
[Euthanasia and other decisions at the end of life (Proposal for a more transparent terminology and some thoughts on the legal framework of medical treatment)].[安乐死及临终时的其他决策(关于更清晰术语的提议及对医疗法律框架的一些思考)]
Orv Hetil. 2010 Oct 24;151(43):1769-75. doi: 10.1556/OH.2010.28954.
6
A case against something that is not the case: the Groningen Protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265160802521039.
7
Dutch Protocols for Deliberately Ending the Life of Newborns: A Defence.荷兰关于故意结束新生儿生命的协议:一种辩护。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Jun;14(2):251-259. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9772-2. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia (the Groningen Protocol).反对正当的非自愿主动安乐死(《格罗宁根协议》)的一个案例。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):23-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513085.
9
The constitutional right to suicide, the quality of life, and the "slippery slope": an explicit reply to lingering concerns.自杀的宪法权利、生活质量与“滑坡谬误”:对长期存在的担忧的明确回应
Akron Law Rev. 1994 Summer;28(1):53-76.
10
After the slippery slope: Dutch experiences on regulating active euthanasia.滑坡之后:荷兰在规范主动安乐死方面的经验。
J Soc Christ Ethics. 2003 Fall-Winter;23(2):225-42.

引用本文的文献

1
What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review.哪些医疗状况会导致安乐死申请?一项快速综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 20;7(3):e1978. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1978. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
End of life care in the setting of extreme prematurity - practical challenges and ethical controversies.极早产儿的终末关怀——实际挑战与伦理争议。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):101442. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101442. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies.
围绕新型外孕技术应用的伦理、转化及法律问题。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 24;15:2207-2220. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358553. eCollection 2022.
4
Dutch Protocols for Deliberately Ending the Life of Newborns: A Defence.荷兰关于故意结束新生儿生命的协议:一种辩护。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Jun;14(2):251-259. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9772-2. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
Value-impregnated factual claims and slippery-slope arguments.充满价值观的事实性主张和滑坡论证。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9723-4.
6
Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?严重患病新生儿的非自愿安乐死:格罗宁根方案真的危险吗?
Hippokratia. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):193-203.
7
Can a physician ever justifiably euthanize a severely disabled neonate?医生是否可以合理地对严重残疾的新生儿实施安乐死?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):532. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.040. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
8
Attitudes among the general Austrian population towards neonatal euthanasia: a survey.奥地利普通民众对新生儿安乐死的态度:一项调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Oct 7;15:74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-74.