• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言产生如何塑造语言形式和理解。

How language production shapes language form and comprehension.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
PMID:23637689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3636467/
Abstract

Language production processes can provide insight into how language comprehension works and language typology-why languages tend to have certain characteristics more often than others. Drawing on work in memory retrieval, motor planning, and serial order in action planning, the Production-Distribution-Comprehension (PDC) account links work in the fields of language production, typology, and comprehension: (1) faced with substantial computational burdens of planning and producing utterances, language producers implicitly follow three biases in utterance planning that promote word order choices that reduce these burdens, thereby improving production fluency. (2) These choices, repeated over many utterances and individuals, shape the distributions of utterance forms in language. The claim that language form stems in large degree from producers' attempts to mitigate utterance planning difficulty is contrasted with alternative accounts in which form is driven by language use more broadly, language acquisition processes, or producers' attempts to create language forms that are easily understood by comprehenders. (3) Language perceivers implicitly learn the statistical regularities in their linguistic input, and they use this prior experience to guide comprehension of subsequent language. In particular, they learn to predict the sequential structure of linguistic signals, based on the statistics of previously-encountered input. Thus, key aspects of comprehension behavior are tied to lexico-syntactic statistics in the language, which in turn derive from utterance planning biases promoting production of comparatively easy utterance forms over more difficult ones. This approach contrasts with classic theories in which comprehension behaviors are attributed to innate design features of the language comprehension system and associated working memory. The PDC instead links basic features of comprehension to a different source: production processes that shape language form.

摘要

语言产生过程可以深入了解语言理解的工作原理和语言类型学——为什么语言往往具有某些特征而不是其他特征。基于记忆检索、运动规划和动作规划中的序列顺序的工作,生产-分配-理解(PDC)理论将语言产生、类型学和理解领域的工作联系起来:(1)面对规划和产生话语的巨大计算负担,语言产生者在话语规划中隐含地遵循三个偏向,这些偏向促进了减少这些负担的词序选择,从而提高了生产流畅度。(2)这些选择在许多话语和个体中重复出现,从而塑造了语言中话语形式的分布。语言形式在很大程度上源于产生者试图减轻话语规划难度的主张,与其他将形式更多地归因于语言使用、语言习得过程或产生者试图创造容易被理解者理解的语言形式的理论形成对比。(3)语言感知者在其语言输入中隐含地学习统计规律,并利用这种先前的经验来指导对后续语言的理解。特别是,他们学会了根据先前遇到的输入的统计数据来预测语言信号的顺序结构。因此,理解行为的关键方面与语言中的词汇-句法统计数据有关,而这些统计数据又源于促进产生相对容易的话语形式而不是更困难的话语形式的话语规划偏向。这种方法与经典理论形成对比,经典理论将理解行为归因于语言理解系统的内在设计特征和相关工作记忆。PDC 理论相反,将理解的基本特征与不同的来源联系起来:即塑造语言形式的产生过程。

相似文献

1
How language production shapes language form and comprehension.语言产生如何塑造语言形式和理解。
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226. eCollection 2013.
2
When language comprehension reflects production constraints: resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience.当语言理解反映了生产限制:借助过去的经验解决歧义。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1177-86. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1177.
3
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.语言产生与理解的统一理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
5
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.作为从语言理解和产出中浮现的言语工作记忆。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. eCollection 2020.
6
Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.言语规划中句法差异的神经特征。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Jan 26;19(1):e3001038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001038. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Production Before Comprehension in the Emergence of Transitive Constructions in Dutch Child Language.荷兰儿童语言中及物结构出现过程中的理解前产出
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 26;11:546495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.546495. eCollection 2020.
8
Intervention for oral language comprehension skills in preschoolers with developmental language disorder.对发育性语言障碍学龄前儿童口语理解技能的干预。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):90-102. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12676. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Domain-General Brain Regions Do Not Track Linguistic Input as Closely as Language-Selective Regions.非语言特异性脑区对语言输入的追踪不如语言特异性脑区紧密。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 11;37(41):9999-10011. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3642-16.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Syntax, morphosyntax, and serial recall: How language supports short-term memory.句法、形态句法和序列回忆:语言如何支持短期记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):174-191. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01203-z. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) programme is associated with lasting improvements in children's language and reading skills.纳菲尔德早期语言干预(NELI)项目与儿童语言和阅读技能的持久提升相关。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14157.
2
Hearing Pronouns Primes Speakers to Use Pronouns.听到代词会促使说话者使用代词。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jan 4;9:47-69. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00178. eCollection 2025.
3
Grammatical gender in spoken word recognition in school-age Spanish monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children.

本文引用的文献

1
On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency.论语言的“实用性”:处理复杂性和交流效率。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 May;2(3):323-335. doi: 10.1002/wcs.126. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
2
Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules.统计学习:从获取特定项目到形成一般规则。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun 1;21(3):170-176. doi: 10.1177/0963721412436806.
3
(Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences.(未)听取选修科目:语用使用偏好的影响。
学龄期西班牙语单语和西班牙语-英语双语儿童口语单词识别中的语法性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 24;15:1295379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295379. eCollection 2024.
4
Cognitive causes of 'like me' race and gender biases in human language production.人类语言产生中“像我一样”的种族和性别偏见的认知原因。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1706-1715. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01943-3. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Word frequency and cognitive effort in turns-at-talk: turn structure affects processing load in natural conversation.轮流交谈中的词频与认知努力:话轮结构影响自然对话中的处理负荷。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1208029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1208029. eCollection 2024.
6
A universal preference for animate agents in hominids.人类对有生命主体的普遍偏好。
iScience. 2024 May 16;27(6):109996. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109996. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.
7
Surprisal From Language Models Can Predict ERPs in Processing Predicate-Argument Structures Only if Enriched by an Agent Preference Principle.只有通过主体偏好原则进行强化,语言模型的意外值才能预测谓词-论元结构处理过程中的事件相关电位。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):167-200. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00121. eCollection 2024.
8
What Does Mean? Complementizers and Epistemic Authority.“……是什么意思?补语词和认知权威。”
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Mar 26;8:366-394. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00135. eCollection 2024.
9
Structural priming from production to comprehension in aphasia.失语症中从产出到理解的结构启动效应
Aphasiology. 2024;38(1):70-91. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2159314. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
10
What corpus data reveal about the Position of Antecedent Strategy: anaphora resolution in Spanish monolinguals and L1 English-L2 Spanish bilinguals.语料库数据揭示了先行词策略的位置:西班牙语单语者和英语母语-西班牙语二语者的指代消解
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1246710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1246710. eCollection 2023.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Jul 1;67(1):211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
Taking action: a cross-modal investigation of discourse-level representations.采取行动:话语层面表征的跨模态研究
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 11;3:156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00156. eCollection 2012.
5
How lingering representations of abandoned context words affect speech production.被摒弃的上下文词汇的持续表征如何影响言语产生。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jul;140(3):218-29. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
6
Animacy and competition in relative clause production: a cross-linguistic investigation.论相对从句生成中的有生性和竞争:一项跨语言研究。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Sep;65(2):141-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Learned predictiveness speeds visual processing.学习预测性加快视觉处理。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):359-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797611429800. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
8
Referential and visual cues to structural choice in visually situated sentence production.视觉情境句子生成中结构选择的参照和视觉线索。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 18;2:396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00396. eCollection 2011.
9
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
10
The communicative function of ambiguity in language.语言歧义的交际功能。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):280-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 20.