• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当语言理解反映了生产限制:借助过去的经验解决歧义。

When language comprehension reflects production constraints: resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 1202 W. Johnson St., University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1177-86. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1177.

DOI:10.3758/MC.37.8.1177
PMID:19933460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241265/
Abstract

A key assumption in language comprehension is that biases in behavioral data, such as the tendency to interpret John said that Mary left yesterday to mean that yesterday modifies the syntactically local verb left, not the distant verb said, reflect inherent biases in the language comprehension system. In the present article, an alternative production-distribution-comprehension (PDC) account is pursued; this account states that comprehension biases emerge from different interpretation frequencies in the language, which themselves emerge from pressures on the language production system to produce some structures more than others. In two corpus analyses and two self-paced reading experiments, we investigated these claims for verb modification ambiguities, for which phrase length is hypothesized to shape production. The results support claims that tendencies to produce short phrases before long ones create distributional regularities for modification ambiguities in the language and that learning over these regularities shapes comprehenders' interpretations of modification ambiguities. Implications for the PDC and other accounts are discussed.

摘要

语言理解中的一个关键假设是,行为数据中的偏差,例如将 John said that Mary left yesterday 解释为 yesterday 修饰句法上的本地动词 left,而不是远处的动词 said,反映了语言理解系统固有的偏差。在本文中,提出了一种替代的产生-分布-理解(PDC)理论;该理论指出,理解偏差源于语言中不同的解释频率,而这些频率本身源于语言产生系统的压力,需要产生某些结构而不是其他结构。在两项语料库分析和两项眼动实验中,我们研究了这些关于动词修饰歧义的说法,其中假设短语长度会影响产生。结果支持了以下说法,即在产生长短语之前先产生短短语的倾向为语言中的修饰歧义创造了分布规律,并且通过这些规律进行学习会影响理解者对修饰歧义的解释。讨论了 PDC 和其他理论的含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c670/4241265/751318ed0714/nihms643266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c670/4241265/d773abd45f36/nihms643266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c670/4241265/751318ed0714/nihms643266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c670/4241265/d773abd45f36/nihms643266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c670/4241265/751318ed0714/nihms643266f2.jpg

相似文献

1
When language comprehension reflects production constraints: resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience.当语言理解反映了生产限制:借助过去的经验解决歧义。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1177-86. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1177.
2
Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.一致性和一致性吸引中的误解。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):950-71. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.992445. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension.理解过程中启动介词短语附着
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):468-481. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468.
4
Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.语言理解过程中基于相似性的干扰:来自阅读过程中眼动追踪的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1304-21. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1304.
5
Linking production and comprehension processes: the case of relative clauses.连接生产与理解过程:关系从句的案例
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
6
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.获取与处理动词论元结构:微型语言中的分布学习
Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):165-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
7
Argument status and PP-attachment.论点状态与PP附着
J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 Sep;35(5):385-403. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9021-z.
8
The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.语用原则在解决依恋模糊性中的作用:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):314-28. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.314.
9
Do as I say, not as I do: a lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition.照我说的做,而不是照我做的做:英语方位动词类习得的词汇分布解释。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep;73:41-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
10
Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.句法歧义消解中的个体差异:读者在合理性信息的使用上存在差异。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):375-91. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.375.

引用本文的文献

1
Lexico-Semantic Influence on Syntactic Processing: An Eye-Tracking Study with Spanish Relative Clauses.词汇语义对句法加工的影响:一项关于西班牙语关系从句的眼动追踪研究。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 26;13(3):409. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030409.
2
Autocorrection if→of function words in reading aloud: A novel marker of Alzheimer's risk.朗读时自动纠正功能词:阿尔茨海默病风险的新标志物。
Neuropsychology. 2023 Oct;37(7):813-826. doi: 10.1037/neu0000829. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Examining the relationship between comprehension and production processes in code-switched language.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.宾语关系从句中的语义不确定性。
J Mem Lang. 2008;58(4):161-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004.
2
Linking production and comprehension processes: the case of relative clauses.连接生产与理解过程:关系从句的案例
Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
3
Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.经验与句子处理:统计学习与关系从句理解
研究语码转换语言中理解与产出过程之间的关系。
J Mem Lang. 2016 Aug;89:138-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Processing of Spanish-English Code-Switches by Late Bilinguals.晚期双语者对西班牙语-英语语码转换的处理
Proc Annu Boston Univ Conf Lang Dev. 2013 May;37:134-146.
5
Information status relates to production, distribution, and comprehension.信息状态与生产、分配和理解相关。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 10;4:235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00235. eCollection 2013.
6
How language production shapes language form and comprehension.语言产生如何塑造语言形式和理解。
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226. eCollection 2013.
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):250-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
4
Phrasing effects in comprehending PP constructions.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 May;35(3):245-65. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9014-y. Epub 2006 May 12.
5
Becoming syntactic.变得符合句法规则。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):234-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234.
6
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.迈向对话的机械心理学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Apr;27(2):169-90; discussion 190-226. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x04000056.
7
Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production.语言生成中的语义整合与句法规划。
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Aug;49(1):1-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.10.001.
8
Learning first-pass structural attachment preferences with dynamic grammars and recursive neural networks.
Cognition. 2003 Jun;88(2):133-69. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00026-x.
9
Recency in verb phrase attachment.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):574-90. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.574.
10
The concomitant effects of phrase length and informational content in sentence comprehension.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Mar;29(2):195-203. doi: 10.1023/a:1005197012421.