Myachykov Andriy, Thompson Dominic, Garrod Simon, Scheepers Christoph
Department of Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK.
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 18;2:396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00396. eCollection 2011.
We investigated how conceptually informative (referent preview) and conceptually uninformative (pointer to referent's location) visual cues affect structural choice during production of English transitive sentences. Cueing the Agent or the Patient prior to presenting the target-event reliably predicted the likelihood of selecting this referent as the sentential Subject, triggering, correspondingly, the choice between active and passive voice. Importantly, there was no difference in the magnitude of the general Cueing effect between the informative and uninformative cueing conditions, suggesting that attentionally driven structural selection relies on a direct automatic mapping mechanism from attentional focus to the Subject's position in a sentence. This mechanism is, therefore, independent of accessing conceptual, and possibly lexical, information about the cued referent provided by referent preview.
我们研究了概念性信息丰富的视觉线索(指称物预览)和概念性信息不丰富的视觉线索(指向指称物位置的指针)如何在英语及物句子的生成过程中影响结构选择。在呈现目标事件之前提示施事或受事,能够可靠地预测将该指称物选为句子主语的可能性,相应地会引发主动语态和被动语态之间的选择。重要的是,信息丰富的提示条件和信息不丰富的提示条件之间的一般提示效应大小没有差异,这表明注意力驱动的结构选择依赖于一种从注意力焦点到句子中主语位置的直接自动映射机制。因此,这种机制独立于获取由指称物预览提供的关于被提示指称物的概念性信息,甚至可能是词汇性信息。