• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地上生物量和地下生物量之间的中度耦合使草原的持久性最大化。

Intermediate coupling between aboveground and belowground biomass maximises the persistence of grasslands.

机构信息

Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum (LOEWE BiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e61149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061149. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0061149
PMID:23637792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3639234/
Abstract

Aboveground and belowground biomass compartments of vegetation fulfil different functions and they are coupled by complex interactions. These compartments exchange water, carbon and nutrients and the belowground biomass compartment has the capacity to buffer vegetation dynamics when aboveground biomass is removed by disturbances such as herbivory or fire. However, despite their importance, root-shoot interactions are often ignored in more heuristic vegetation models. Here, we present a simple two-compartment grassland model that couples aboveground and belowground biomass. In this model, the growth of belowground biomass is influenced by aboveground biomass and the growth of aboveground biomass is influenced by belowground biomass. We used the model to explore how the dynamics of a grassland ecosystem are influenced by fire and grazing. We show that the grassland system is most persistent at intermediate levels of aboveground-belowground coupling. In this situation, the system can sustain more extreme fire or grazing regimes than in the case of strong coupling. In contrast, the productivity of the system is maximised at high levels of coupling. Our analysis suggests that the yield of a grassland ecosystem is maximised when coupling is strong, however, the intensity of disturbance that can be sustained increases dramatically when coupling is intermediate. Hence, the model predicts that intermediate coupling should be selected for as it maximises the chances of persistence in disturbance driven ecosystems.

摘要

植被的地上和地下生物量部分履行不同的功能,并通过复杂的相互作用耦合在一起。这些部分交换水、碳和养分,地下生物量部分具有在地上生物量被食草动物或火灾等干扰去除时缓冲植被动态的能力。然而,尽管它们很重要,但根系-茎叶相互作用在更启发式的植被模型中经常被忽略。在这里,我们提出了一个简单的两部分草地模型,它将地上和地下生物量耦合在一起。在这个模型中,地下生物量的生长受到地上生物量的影响,地上生物量的生长受到地下生物量的影响。我们使用该模型来探讨草原生态系统的动态如何受到火灾和放牧的影响。我们表明,在地上-地下耦合的中等水平下,草原系统最具持久性。在这种情况下,系统可以承受比强耦合更强的极端火灾或放牧制度。相比之下,系统的生产力在高耦合水平下达到最大值。我们的分析表明,当耦合很强时,草原生态系统的产量达到最大值,但是,当耦合处于中等水平时,系统可以承受的干扰强度会显著增加。因此,该模型预测,中间耦合应该被选择,因为它最大限度地提高了在受干扰驱动的生态系统中持续存在的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/2000c573347b/pone.0061149.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/936d6dec6697/pone.0061149.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/121785c96815/pone.0061149.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/7e3ce436a3a8/pone.0061149.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/e6fb093a495f/pone.0061149.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/2000c573347b/pone.0061149.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/936d6dec6697/pone.0061149.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/121785c96815/pone.0061149.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/7e3ce436a3a8/pone.0061149.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/e6fb093a495f/pone.0061149.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7402/3639234/2000c573347b/pone.0061149.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Intermediate coupling between aboveground and belowground biomass maximises the persistence of grasslands.地上生物量和地下生物量之间的中度耦合使草原的持久性最大化。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e61149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061149. Print 2013.
2
While shoot herbivores reduce, root herbivores increase nutrient enrichment's impact on diversity in a grassland model.当食草动物减少时,根食草动物会增加养分富集对草原模型中多样性的影响。
Ecology. 2021 May;102(5):e03333. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3333. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
Grazing intensity significantly affects belowground carbon and nitrogen cycling in grassland ecosystems: a meta-analysis.放牧强度显著影响草原生态系统的地下碳氮循环:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Mar;23(3):1167-1179. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13431. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
4
Belowground bud bank response to grazing under severe, short-term drought.地下芽库在严重短期干旱下对放牧的响应。
Oecologia. 2015 Jul;178(3):795-806. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3249-y. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Fire and herbivory drive fungal and bacterial communities through distinct above- and belowground mechanisms.火和食草作用通过不同的地上和地下机制驱动真菌和细菌群落。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147189. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147189. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
6
Remotely detected aboveground plant function predicts belowground processes in two prairie diversity experiments.在两项草原多样性实验中,远程检测到的地上植物功能可预测地下过程。
Ecol Monogr. 2022 Feb;92(1):e01488. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1488. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Grazing exclusion promotes grasses functional group dominance via increasing of bud banks in steppe community.放牧排除通过增加草原群落的芽库促进了草功能群的优势。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109589. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109589. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
Resilience and restoration of tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and grassy woodlands.热带和亚热带草原、稀树草原和草地林地的恢复力和恢复。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Apr;94(2):590-609. doi: 10.1111/brv.12470. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Stoichiometric modeling of aboveground-belowground interaction of herbaceous plant.草本植物地上-地下相互作用的化学计量模型
Math Biosci Eng. 2018 Dec 5;16(1):25-55. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019002.
10
Crucial roles of the optimal time-scale of water condition on grassland biomass estimation on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.水分条件最优时间尺度对青藏高原草地生物量估算的关键作用
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167210. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167210. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymmetric Light Competition and Founder Control in Plant Communities.植物群落中的不对称光竞争与奠基者控制
J Theor Biol. 1997 Feb 7;184(3):353-358. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0297.
2
A Minimal Model for Forest Fire Regimes.森林火灾模式的最小模型。
Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):527-539. doi: 10.1086/303194.
3
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species.C3 植物叶片光合作用 CO2 同化的生化模型。
Planta. 1980 Jun;149(1):78-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00386231.
4
The stability of African savannas: insights from the indirect estimation of the parameters of a dynamic model.非洲热带稀树草原的稳定性:来自动态模型参数间接估计的见解。
Ecology. 2010 Jun;91(6):1682-92. doi: 10.1890/08-1368.1.
5
Empirical and theoretical challenges in aboveground-belowground ecology.地上-地下生态学中的实证与理论挑战。
Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1351-8. Epub 2009 May 3.
6
Partitioning of root and shoot competition and the stability of savannas.根系与地上部分竞争的划分以及稀树草原的稳定性
Am Nat. 2007 Oct;170(4):587-601. doi: 10.1086/521317. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
7
Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate.24 种相对生长率不同的野生种的碳氮经济。
Plant Physiol. 1990 Oct;94(2):621-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.2.621.
8
Determinants of woody cover in African savannas.非洲稀树草原木本植物覆盖度的决定因素。
Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):846-9. doi: 10.1038/nature04070.
9
Harvesting in seasonal environments.在季节性环境中收获。
J Math Biol. 2005 Jun;50(6):663-82. doi: 10.1007/s00285-004-0303-5. Epub 2004 Dec 20.
10
Stability in simple grazing models: effects of explicit functions.简单放牧模型中的稳定性:显式函数的影响
J Theor Biol. 1978 Apr 6;71(3):347-80. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90165-0.