Cavender-Bares Jeannine, Schweiger Anna K, Gamon John A, Gholizadeh Hamed, Helzer Kimberly, Lapadat Cathleen, Madritch Michael D, Townsend Philip A, Wang Zhihui, Hobbie Sarah E
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota 55108 USA.
Département de Sciences Biologiques Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale Université de Montréal Montréal Québec H1X 2B2 Canada.
Ecol Monogr. 2022 Feb;92(1):e01488. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1488. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Imaging spectroscopy provides the opportunity to incorporate leaf and canopy optical data into ecological studies, but the extent to which remote sensing of vegetation can enhance the study of belowground processes is not well understood. In terrestrial systems, aboveground and belowground vegetation quantity and quality are coupled, and both influence belowground microbial processes and nutrient cycling. We hypothesized that ecosystem productivity, and the chemical, structural and phylogenetic-functional composition of plant communities would be detectable with remote sensing and could be used to predict belowground plant and soil processes in two grassland biodiversity experiments: the BioDIV experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota and the Wood River Nature Conservancy experiment in Nebraska. We tested whether aboveground vegetation chemistry and productivity, as detected from airborne sensors, predict soil properties, microbial processes and community composition. Imaging spectroscopy data were used to map aboveground biomass, green vegetation cover, functional traits and phylogenetic-functional community composition of vegetation. We examined the relationships between the image-derived variables and soil carbon and nitrogen concentration, microbial community composition, biomass and extracellular enzyme activity, and soil processes, including net nitrogen mineralization. In the BioDIV experiment-which has low overall diversity and productivity despite high variation in each-belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the amount of organic matter inputs to soils. As a consequence, soil respiration, microbial biomass and enzyme activity, and fungal and bacterial composition and diversity were significantly predicted by remotely sensed vegetation cover and biomass. In contrast, at Wood River-where plant diversity and productivity were consistently higher-belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the quality of aboveground inputs to soils. Consequently, remotely sensed functional, chemical and phylogenetic composition of vegetation predicted belowground extracellular enzyme activity, microbial biomass, and net nitrogen mineralization rates but aboveground biomass (or cover) did not. The contrasting associations between the quantity (productivity) and quality (composition) of aboveground inputs with belowground soil attributes provide a basis for using imaging spectroscopy to understand belowground processes across productivity gradients in grassland systems. However, a mechanistic understanding of how above and belowground components interact among different ecosystems remains critical to extending these results broadly.
成像光谱技术为将叶片和冠层光学数据纳入生态研究提供了契机,但植被遥感在多大程度上能够加强对地下过程的研究,目前还不太清楚。在陆地系统中,地上和地下植被的数量与质量相互关联,二者都会影响地下微生物过程和养分循环。我们推测,在两项草地生物多样性实验中,即明尼苏达州雪松溪生态科学保护区的生物多样性(BioDIV)实验和内布拉斯加州伍德河自然保护协会实验中,生态系统生产力以及植物群落的化学、结构和系统发育功能组成可以通过遥感检测到,并且可用于预测地下植物和土壤过程。我们测试了从机载传感器检测到的地上植被化学性质和生产力是否能够预测土壤性质、微生物过程和群落组成。成像光谱数据被用于绘制地上生物量、绿色植被覆盖度、功能性状以及植被的系统发育功能群落组成。我们研究了图像衍生变量与土壤碳氮浓度、微生物群落组成、生物量和胞外酶活性以及包括净氮矿化在内的土壤过程之间的关系。在BioDIV实验中——尽管每个因素的变化很大,但总体多样性和生产力较低——地下过程主要受土壤有机质输入量变化的驱动。因此,遥感植被覆盖度和生物量能够显著预测土壤呼吸、微生物生物量和酶活性以及真菌和细菌的组成与多样性。相比之下,在伍德河地区——那里植物多样性和生产力一直较高——地下过程主要受土壤地上输入质量变化的驱动。因此,植被的遥感功能、化学和系统发育组成能够预测地下胞外酶活性、微生物生物量和净氮矿化速率,但地上生物量(或覆盖度)则不能。地上输入的数量(生产力)和质量(组成)与地下土壤属性之间的对比关系,为利用成像光谱技术理解草地系统生产力梯度上的地下过程提供了依据。然而,对于不同生态系统中地上和地下组分如何相互作用的机理理解,对于广泛推广这些结果仍然至关重要。