Sullivan Sean D, Dalal Mehul R, Burke James P
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Dr Sullivan)
Sanofi US, Inc, Bridgewater, New Jersey (Dr Dalal)
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):523-31. doi: 10.1177/0145721713486525. Epub 2013 May 2.
The purpose of this study is to examine outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who received diabetes counseling and education (C/E) services compared with those who did not.
A matched, retrospective cohort study of 17 483 C/E recipients and 17 470 non-C/E controls was followed for up to 12 months. Outcomes included glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin A1C levels <7.0%), hypoglycemic events, and health care utilization and costs.
Compared with the non-C/E group, patients in the C/E group had significantly lower A1C (7.7% vs 7.2%) and were more likely to achieve glycemic control at 6 months' follow-up; they were also more likely to have a hypoglycemic event. During the 1-year period following the index date, C/E recipients had more inpatient visits (0.21 vs 0.20 visits per patient) and ambulatory visits (21.5 vs 18.6 visits per patient) compared with non-C/E controls. The increased use of health care services in the C/E groups was associated with $2388 higher annual overall costs and $827 higher diabetes-related costs.
Diabetes C/E is associated with improved glycemic control, albeit with a slight increase in the risk of hypoglycemia. C/E was associated with higher health care costs across 12 months. Further analyses are needed to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of diabetes counseling and education.
本研究旨在比较接受糖尿病咨询与教育(C/E)服务的成年2型糖尿病患者与未接受该服务的患者的治疗结果。
对17483名接受C/E服务者和17470名非C/E服务对照者进行匹配的回顾性队列研究,随访长达12个月。结果包括血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白A1C水平<7.0%)、低血糖事件以及医疗保健利用情况和费用。
与非C/E组相比,C/E组患者的A1C显著更低(7.7%对7.2%),且在6个月随访时更有可能实现血糖控制;他们发生低血糖事件的可能性也更高。在索引日期后的1年期间,与非C/E对照组相比,接受C/E服务者的住院就诊次数更多(每位患者0.21次对0.20次),门诊就诊次数也更多(每位患者21.5次对18.6次)。C/E组医疗保健服务使用的增加与年度总费用高出2388美元以及糖尿病相关费用高出827美元相关。
糖尿病C/E与血糖控制改善相关,尽管低血糖风险略有增加。C/E与12个月期间更高的医疗保健费用相关。需要进一步分析以评估糖尿病咨询与教育的长期成本效益。