Edupuganti Subhash, Bushman Jordan, Maditz Rhyan, Kaminoulu Pradeep, Halalau Alexandra
1Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, Michigan, Rochester Hills, MI 48073 USA.
2Department of Internal Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI USA.
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jul 23;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0084-9. eCollection 2019.
American Diabetes Association (ADA) sets annual guidelines on preventative measures that aim to delay the onset of severe diabetes mellitus complications. Compared to private internal medicine clinics, resident clinics provide suboptimal diabetic preventative care as evidenced by decreased compliance with ADA guidelines. The purpose of our study is to improve diabetic care in resident clinics through quality improvement (QI) projects, with A1C value as primary outcome and other ADA guidelines as secondary outcomes.
Our resident clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak consists of 76 residents divided in 8 teams. In November 2016, baseline data on ADA guideline measures was obtained on 538 patients with diabetes mellitus. A root cause analysis was conducted. 5 teams developed a QI intervention plan to improve their diabetes care and 3 teams served as comparisons without intervention plans. In November 2017, post-intervention data was collected.
Baseline characteristics demonstrate mean age of intervention groups at 60.9 years and of comparison groups at 58.9 years. The change in A1C value from baseline to post-intervention was + 0.09 vs. + 0.322 in the intervention and comparison groups respectively ( = 0.174). As a group, the changes in secondary outcome measures were as follows: eye examinations (+ 5% in intervention vs. -7% in comparison, < 0.01), foot examinations (+ 13% vs. + 5%, = 0.09), lipid panel testing (+ 7% vs. -5%, < 0.01), micro-albumin/creatinine ratio testing (+ 4% vs. + 1%, = 0.03), and A1C testing (+8% vs. + 5%, = 0.24).
While the QI project did not improve A1C value, it did have significant improvement in several secondary outcomes within intervention groups. One resident team implemented an intervention involving protected half-day blocks to identify overdue examinations and consequently had the largest improvements, thus serving as a potential intervention to further study. Given our study results, we believe that QI interventions improve preventative care for patients with diabetes in resident clinics.
美国糖尿病协会(ADA)制定了年度预防措施指南,旨在延缓严重糖尿病并发症的发生。与私立内科诊所相比,住院医师诊所提供的糖尿病预防护理欠佳,ADA指南的依从性降低就证明了这一点。我们研究的目的是通过质量改进(QI)项目改善住院医师诊所的糖尿病护理,将糖化血红蛋白(A1C)值作为主要结果,将其他ADA指南作为次要结果。
我们在皇家橡树博蒙特医院的住院医师诊所由76名住院医师组成,分为8个团队。2016年11月,获取了538名糖尿病患者的ADA指南措施基线数据。进行了根本原因分析。5个团队制定了QI干预计划以改善他们的糖尿病护理,3个团队作为对照组未制定干预计划。2017年11月,收集了干预后的数据。
基线特征显示,干预组的平均年龄为60.9岁,对照组为58.9岁。从基线到干预后,干预组和对照组的A1C值变化分别为+0.09和+0.322(P = 0.174)。作为一个整体,次要结果指标的变化如下:眼科检查(干预组为+5%,对照组为-7%,P < 0.01)、足部检查(+13%对+5%,P = 0.09)、血脂检测(+7%对-5%,P < 0.01)、微量白蛋白/肌酐比值检测(+4%对+1%,P = 0.03)以及A1C检测(+8%对+5%,P = 0.24)。
虽然QI项目没有改善A1C值,但在干预组的几个次要结果方面有显著改善。一个住院医师团队实施了一项干预措施,包括预留半天时间来识别逾期检查,因此取得了最大的改善,从而可作为进一步研究的潜在干预措施。鉴于我们的研究结果,我们认为QI干预可改善住院医师诊所中糖尿病患者的预防护理。