Robins C J, Block P, Peselow E D
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1990 May;29(2):201-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1990.tb00870.x.
A comparison was made between endogenous and non-endogenous depressed patients on several characteristics on which they traditionally have been asserted to differ, and which play important roles in cognitive approaches to depression. The non-endogenous patients reported more dysfunctional attitudes and a greater number of recent life events than did endogenous patients. These results support the distinction between endogenous and non-endogenous depressions, and suggest that cognitive theories of aetiology may be more relevant for the latter group. However, both groups perceived their recent upsetting events in relatively maladaptive ways, consistent with the idea that biased perceptions are more related to the depressive state, whereas dysfunctional attitudes may represent a trait vulnerability.
对内因性和非内因性抑郁症患者在几个传统上认为存在差异且在抑郁症认知研究方法中起重要作用的特征方面进行了比较。非内因性患者比内因性患者报告了更多功能失调性态度和更多近期生活事件。这些结果支持了内因性和非内因性抑郁症之间的区别，并表明病因学的认知理论可能与后一组更相关。然而，两组都以相对适应不良的方式看待他们近期的烦心事，这与以下观点一致，即有偏差的认知与抑郁状态更相关，而功能失调性态度可能代表一种特质易感性。
