Suppr超能文献

猎狐犬诱捕多房棘球绦虫:两座中等城市的对比成果。

Fox baiting against Echinococcus multilocularis: contrasted achievements among two medium size cities.

机构信息

Entente de Lutte Interdépartementale contre les Zoonoses (ELIZ), Domaine de Pixérécourt, Bâtiment G, 54220 Malzéville, France.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2013 Aug 1;111(1-2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Abstract

In Europe, most cities are currently colonized by red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), which are considered to be the main definitive host of the zoonotic cestode Echinococcus multilocularis. The risk of transmission to humans is of particular concern where high fox populations overlap with high human populations. The distribution of baits containing praziquantel has successfully reduced the infection pressure in rural areas and in small plots within large cities. The purpose of this study was to assess its efficiency in two medium size cities (less than 100,000 inhabitants) in areas of high human alveolar echinococcosis incidence. From August 2006 to March 2009, 14 baiting campaigns of praziquantel treatment were run in Annemasse and Pontarlier (Eastern France), each of which encompassed 33 km(2), with a density of 40 baits/km(2). The bait consumption appeared to be lower in strictly urban context compared to suburban areas (78.9% vs. 93.4%) and lower in Annemasse than in Pontarlier (82.2% vs. 89.5%). During our study, the prevalence of E. multilocularis, as assessed by EM-ELISA on fox faeces collected in the field in Annemasse, was lower within the treated area than in the rural control area. A "before/during" treatment comparison revealed a significant decrease of spring prevalence from 13.3% to 2.2%. No significant change in prevalence was detected in Pontarlier (stable prevalence: 9.1%) where the contamination of the treated area followed the temporal trend observed in the control area. There, a greater resilience of the parasite's life cycle, probably due to a strong pressure of recontamination from outside the treated area, may have counteracted the prophylaxis treatment. These contrasted outcomes suggest that the frequency of fox anthelmintic treatment should be adapted to the local situation.

摘要

在欧洲,大多数城市目前都被红狐(Vulpes vulpes)占领,红狐被认为是动物源性细粒棘球绦虫(Echinococcus multilocularis)的主要终末宿主。当狐狸种群密度较高且与人类密度较高的地区重叠时,传播给人类的风险尤其令人担忧。含有吡喹酮的诱饵的分布成功地降低了农村地区和大城市中小地段的感染压力。本研究的目的是评估其在两个中等城市(人口少于 10 万)高发区的效率。2006 年 8 月至 2009 年 3 月,在法国东部的昂纳西和蓬塔利耶(Pontarlier)进行了 14 次吡喹酮治疗诱饵投放活动,每个地区的范围为 33 平方公里,诱饵密度为 40 个/平方公里。与郊区相比,在严格的城市环境中,诱饵的消耗似乎较低(78.9%比 93.4%),在昂纳西比在蓬塔利耶消耗得更低(82.2%比 89.5%)。在我们的研究中,通过在昂纳西野外收集的狐狸粪便进行的 EM-ELISA 评估,治疗区域内的多房棘球绦虫流行率低于农村对照区域。“之前/期间”治疗比较显示,春季流行率从 13.3%显著下降至 2.2%。在蓬塔利耶没有检测到流行率的显著变化(稳定流行率:9.1%),那里的治疗区污染遵循了对照区观察到的时间趋势。在那里,寄生虫生命周期的更强抵抗力,可能是由于来自治疗区外的再污染的强大压力,可能抵消了预防治疗。这些对比结果表明,应根据当地情况调整狐狸驱虫治疗的频率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验