Suppr超能文献

急诊科对近期发生的心房颤动进行心脏复律是否安全有效?

Is emergency department cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation safe and effective?

作者信息

Cohn Brian G, Keim Samuel M, Yealy Donald M

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common dysrhythmia presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs). Controversy exists regarding the optimal clinical therapy for these patients, which typically focuses on rhythm rate-control and admission or cardioversion and discharge home.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Is ED cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation safe, effective, and does it result in positive meaningful patient outcomes?

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Five observation studies with nearly 1600 ED patients with atrial fibrillation treated with either rate-control or cardioversion were reviewed and results compiled.

RESULTS

Overall, ED cardioversion for recent-onset AF seems safe and effective, with success rates ranging from 85.5% to 97% in these studies. Although further research should seek to identify patients at low risk for thromboembolic complication, more rigorously assess patient satisfaction, and show cost savings, emergency physicians should feel comfortable using this approach in select patients.

CONCLUSION

ED cardioversion for recent-onset AF seems safe and effective.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)是急诊科常见的心律失常。对于这些患者的最佳临床治疗存在争议,通常集中在节律控制、入院或复律及出院回家等方面。

临床问题

急诊科对近期发生的心房颤动进行复律是否安全、有效,是否能带来积极且有意义的患者预后?

证据综述

回顾了五项观察性研究,这些研究对近1600例接受心率控制或复律治疗的急诊科心房颤动患者进行了研究,并汇总了结果。

结果

总体而言,急诊科对近期发生的房颤进行复律似乎是安全有效的,在这些研究中成功率为85.5%至97%。尽管进一步的研究应致力于识别血栓栓塞并发症低风险患者,更严格地评估患者满意度,并证明成本节约,但急诊医生在选择的患者中使用这种方法应感到放心。

结论

急诊科对近期发生的房颤进行复律似乎是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验