Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Aug;53(2):154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 May 1.
A range of interventions have been used for the management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in children and adolescents. Currently, debate exists as to the effectiveness of these different management strategies. The objective of this review was to synthesize and critically appraise the literature on interventions for pediatric CFS/ME.
CINAHL, PsycINFO and Medline databases were searched to retrieve relevant studies of intervention outcomes in children and/or adolescents diagnosed with CFS/ME. Two reviewers independently selected articles and appraised the quality on the basis of predefined criteria.
A total of 24 articles based on 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Methodological design and quality were variable. The majority assessed behavioral interventions (10 multidisciplinary rehabilitation; 9 psychological interventions; 1 exercise intervention; 1 immunological intervention). There was marked heterogeneity in participant and intervention characteristics, and outcome measures used across studies. The strongest evidence was for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based interventions, with weaker evidence for multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Limited information exists on the maintenance of intervention effects.
Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions for children and adolescents with CFS/ME is still emerging. Methodological inadequacies and inconsistent approaches limit interpretation of findings. There is some evidence that children and adolescents with CFS/ME benefit from particular interventions; however, there remain gaps in the current evidence base.
目前已经有多种干预措施用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎(CFS/ME)。目前,对于这些不同管理策略的有效性存在争议。本综述的目的是综合和批判性评价针对儿科 CFS/ME 的干预措施的文献。
检索 CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Medline 数据库,以获取针对 CFS/ME 诊断的儿童和/或青少年干预措施的结果相关研究。两位审稿人独立选择文章,并根据预先确定的标准评估质量。
共有 24 篇基于 21 项研究的文章符合纳入标准。方法设计和质量各不相同。大多数研究评估了行为干预(10 项多学科康复;9 项心理干预;1 项运动干预;1 项免疫干预)。研究之间的参与者和干预特征以及使用的结果测量存在明显的异质性。基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的干预措施的证据最强,而多学科康复的证据较弱。关于干预效果的维持,信息有限。
针对儿童和青少年 CFS/ME 的干预措施的有效性证据仍在不断涌现。方法上的不足和不一致的方法限制了对研究结果的解释。有一些证据表明,患有 CFS/ME 的儿童和青少年受益于某些干预措施;然而,当前证据基础仍存在差距。