Suppr超能文献

系统框架对脊髓损伤与身体活动的研究状况进行分类。

Systematic framework to classify the status of research on spinal cord injury and physical activity.

机构信息

Department of Exercise and Sport Science, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):2027-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically classify the physical activity research for individuals with a spinal cord injury by using the behavioral epidemiologic framework; and to identify where the physical activity research for individuals with a spinal cord injury has focused between 2000 and 2012.

DESIGN

Relevant research was identified and then categorized into 1 of 5 phases by following the coding rules of the behavioral epidemiology framework. Phase 1 studies link physical activity and health outcomes, phase 2 studies validate or develop measures of physical activity, phase 3 studies identify factors that influence behavior or examine explanatory theories of behavior, phase 4 studies evaluate interventions, and phase 5 studies disseminate health promotion programs or policies and translate research into practice.

SETTING

Specific keywords were identified and then searched through EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Google Scholar.

PARTICIPANTS

Not applicable.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen articles met the criteria. Of the articles, 55% were categorized as phase 1, 12% as phase 2, 24% as phase 3, 5% as phase 4, and 4% as phase 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies were categorized as phase 1, 2, or 3, which implies that this field is still in the early stages of development and research should focus on intervention development and dissemination.

摘要

目的

使用行为流行病学框架对脊髓损伤患者的体力活动研究进行系统分类;并确定在 2000 年至 2012 年期间,脊髓损伤患者的体力活动研究集中在哪些方面。

设计

通过遵循行为流行病学框架的编码规则,确定相关研究,并将其分为 5 个阶段之一。第 1 阶段的研究将体力活动与健康结果联系起来,第 2 阶段的研究验证或开发体力活动的测量方法,第 3 阶段的研究确定影响行为的因素或检验行为的解释理论,第 4 阶段的研究评估干预措施,第 5 阶段的研究传播健康促进计划或政策,并将研究转化为实践。

地点

通过 EBSCOhost、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 确定特定的关键词并进行搜索。

参与者

不适用。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

不适用。

结果

符合标准的文章有 113 篇。其中,55%的文章被归类为第 1 阶段,12%的文章被归类为第 2 阶段,24%的文章被归类为第 3 阶段,5%的文章被归类为第 4 阶段,4%的文章被归类为第 5 阶段。

结论

大多数研究被归类为第 1、2 或 3 阶段,这意味着该领域仍处于发展的早期阶段,研究应侧重于干预措施的开发和传播。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验