• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共和私人资金在剖宫产率上升中的作用:一项队列研究。

Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study.

机构信息

Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002789.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002789
PMID:23645918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3646173/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The caesarean section rates have been rising in the developed world for over two decades. This study assessed the involvement of the public and private health sectors in this increase.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Public and private hospitals in Western Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Included in this study were 155 646 births to nulliparous women during 1996-2008.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Caesarean section rates were calculated separately for four patient type groups defined according to mothers' funding source at the time of birth (public/private) and type of delivery hospital (public/private). The average annual per cent change (AAPC) for the caesarean section rates was calculated using joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 45 903 caesarean sections performed (29%) during the study period, 24 803 in-labour and 21 100 prelabour. Until 2005, the rate of caesarean deliveries increased most rapidly on average annually for private patients delivering in private hospitals (AAPC=6.5%) compared with public patients in public hospitals (AAPC=4.3%, p<0.0001). This increase could mostly be attributed to an increase in prelabour caesarean deliveries for this group of women and could not be explained by an increase in breech deliveries, placenta praevia or multiple pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that an increase in the prelabour caesarean delivery rate for private patients in private hospitals has been driving the increase in the caesarean section rate for nulliparous women since 1996. Future research with more detailed information on indication for the prelabour caesarean section is needed to understand the reasons for these findings.

摘要

目的

在发达国家,剖宫产率已经上升了二十多年。本研究评估了公共和私营卫生部门在这一增长中的参与情况。

设计

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

地点

西澳大利亚州的公立和私立医院。

参与者

本研究纳入了 1996 年至 2008 年间 155646 名初产妇。

主要观察指标

根据产妇分娩时的资金来源(公共/私人)和分娩医院类型(公共/私人),将剖宫产率分别计算为四个患者类型组。使用连接点回归计算剖宫产率的平均年百分比变化(AAPC)。

结果

在研究期间,共有 45903 例剖宫产(29%),其中 24803 例为产时剖宫产,21100 例为产前剖宫产。直到 2005 年,与公立医院的公共患者相比,私立医院的私立患者剖宫产率的平均年增长率最快(AAPC=6.5%,p<0.0001)。这种增长主要归因于这组妇女产前剖宫产的增加,而不能用臀位分娩、前置胎盘或多胎妊娠的增加来解释。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,自 1996 年以来,私立医院的私立患者产前剖宫产率的增加一直是初产妇剖宫产率上升的主要原因。未来需要进行更多关于产前剖宫产指征的详细信息研究,以了解这些发现的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/9e2e4193c14c/bmjopen2013002789f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/b7753e8ed7b4/bmjopen2013002789f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/ad121e2c5812/bmjopen2013002789f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/60d9a6912b2f/bmjopen2013002789f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/9e2e4193c14c/bmjopen2013002789f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/b7753e8ed7b4/bmjopen2013002789f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/ad121e2c5812/bmjopen2013002789f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/60d9a6912b2f/bmjopen2013002789f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae5/3646173/9e2e4193c14c/bmjopen2013002789f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study.公共和私人资金在剖宫产率上升中的作用:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002789.
2
Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study.剖宫产率上升的途径:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 4;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001725. Print 2012.
3
Variation in and factors associated with timing of low risk, pre-labour repeat caesarean sections in NSW, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年新南威尔士州低风险、临产前再次剖宫产手术时间的变化及相关因素
Public Health Res Pract. 2016 Jan 28;26(1):e2611608. doi: 10.17061/phrp2611608.
4
Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital.足月臀位分娩的结局:一家区级综合医院的10年经验
BJOG. 2005 Feb;112(2):218-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00323.x.
5
Financing Maternity and Early Childhood Healthcare in The Australian Healthcare System: Costs to Funders in Private and Public Hospitals Over the First 1000 Days.澳大利亚医疗体系中的母婴保健和早期儿童保健筹资:私营和公立医院头 1000 天的供资者成本。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):554-563. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.68.
6
Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.公立医院和私立医院中女性的偏好与分娩方式:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
7
Public-private differences in short-term neonatal outcomes following birth by prelabour caesarean section at early and full term.早产及足月剖宫产分娩后新生儿短期结局的公私差异
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Apr;57(2):176-185. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12591. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
'If I do 10-15 normal deliveries in a month I hardly ever sleep at home.' A qualitative study of health providers' reasons for high rates of caesarean deliveries in private sector maternity care in Delhi, India.'如果我一个月做 10-15 次正常分娩,我几乎从不回家睡觉。' 一项针对印度德里私营部门产科护理中剖腹产率高的卫生提供者原因的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2095-4.
9
Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.你是否付费选择私立医院服务?:一项单中心研究比较了私立患者与公立患者的引产和剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03443-4.
10
Explaining rising caesarean section rates in urban Nepal: A mixed-methods study.解释尼泊尔城市剖宫产率上升的原因:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 26;20(2):e0318489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318489. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data.正常分娩与剖宫产对印度儿童营养状况和死亡率的影响:来自 NFHS-5 数据的见解。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05149-4.
2
Association of Maternal Risk Factors with the Prevalence of Caesarean Section Deliveries: A Cross-Sectional Study.产妇危险因素与剖宫产分娩率的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;11(4):66. doi: 10.3390/medsci11040066.
3
Caesarean Section Delivery Is Associated with Childhood Overweight and Obesity, Low Childbirth Weight and Postnatal Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study.新南威尔士州私立和公立医院中低风险产妇的产科干预率:一项基于人群的描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 10;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723. Print 2012.
2
Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study.剖宫产率上升的途径:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 4;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001725. Print 2012.
3
Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.
剖宫产与儿童期超重和肥胖、低出生体重和产后并发症相关:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 27;59(4):664. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040664.
4
Changes in caesarean section rates in China during the period of transition from the one-child to two-child policy era: cross-sectional National Household Health Services Surveys.中国一孩政策向二孩政策过渡期间剖宫产率的变化:全国家庭健康服务调查的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e059208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059208.
5
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Turkey.COVID-19 大流行对围产期结局的影响:来自土耳其的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04349-5.
6
Can the Robson 10 Group Classification System help identify which groups of women are driving the high caesarean section rate in major private hospitals in eastern Ethiopia? A cross-sectional study.罗夫森 10 组分类系统能否帮助确定哪些妇女群体是导致埃塞俄比亚东部主要私立医院高剖宫产率的原因?一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e047206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047206.
7
Reproducing fear: the effect of birth stories on nulligravid women's birth preferences.再现恐惧:出生故事对初产妇分娩偏好的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03944-w.
8
Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.你是否付费选择私立医院服务?:一项单中心研究比较了私立患者与公立患者的引产和剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03443-4.
9
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Caesarean Section and its Impact on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.阿联酋阿布扎比地区剖宫产率及其影响因素与母乳喂养早期启动的相关性研究。
Nutrients. 2019 Nov 10;11(11):2723. doi: 10.3390/nu11112723.
10
Caesarean sections in the in the context of the Chiranjeevi Yojana public private partnership program to promote institutional birth in Gujarat, India; does the embedded disincentive for caesarean section work?在印度古吉拉特邦奇拉杰维尤贾纳公私合作伙伴关系计划背景下的剖宫产术;其中对剖宫产术的隐性抑制是否起作用?
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 24;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0922-5.
澳大利亚私人医疗保险激励政策改革后剖宫产率的增加。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041436. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
4
Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.初级助产士(产床助产)连续护理对低产科风险妇女剖宫产率的影响:COSMOS 随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1483-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03446.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
5
Hospitalisation for bronchiolitis in infants is more common after elective caesarean delivery.婴儿毛细支气管炎的住院治疗在选择性剖宫产术后更为常见。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 May;97(5):410-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300607. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.导致剖宫产率升高的指征。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.
7
Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州剖宫产分娩的流行病学和趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jan 20;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-8.
8
Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.畏惧诉讼对产科护理的影响:一项针对产科实践的全国性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):277-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271213. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
9
Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.无医学指征的剖宫产与不良短期产妇结局风险增加相关:2004-2008 年世卫组织全球孕产妇和围产儿健康调查。
BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
10
Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.分娩方式对母婴结局的影响:低危产科人群中择期剖宫产与计划性阴道分娩的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;283(6):1193-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1525-y. Epub 2010 May 27.