Cleeland Lauren M, Reichard Mason V, Tito Raul Y, Reinhard Karl J, Lewis Cecil M
University of Oklahoma, Department of Anthropology, 455 West Lindsey, Dale Hall Tower 521, Norman, OK 73019.
J Archaeol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;40(7):3060-3066. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.010.
This paper reports an approach to the identification of prehistoric parasitic infection, which integrates traditional morphological methods with molecular methods. The approach includes the strengths of each method while mitigating the limitations. Demonstrating the efficacy of this approach, we provide a case study from a 1,400 year old desiccated fecal sample from La Cueva de los Muertos Chiquitos, archaeological site, near Rio Zape, Durango, Mexico. Traditionally prepared microscope slides were processed via microscopy and tentative ascarids were identified. Information regarding the parasites' developmental stage was recorded. DNA was then extracted directly from the slide material. From this DNA extract, a small segment of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene variant that is specific to , and its phylogenetically close relatives, was targeted for PCR amplification and sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of the DNA sequence best matched a member of physalopterids, rather than ascarids, with a single exception of a match to . Subsequent extractions, amplifications and sequencing of the original rehydrated coprolite material confirmed these results. The sequence represented a phylogenetic anomaly and subsequent analysis determined the sequence was an error in the BLAST database, likely attributable to misidentification of juvenile specimens prior to sequencing and submission. are a difficult genus to identify morphologically and can carry major health burdens. They may be underreported in humans, in part, because of morphological similarities to the more common human parasites belonging to ascarids. We conclude that integrating traditional morphological methods with molecular methods can help resolve this issue, in both contemporary and prehistoric populations.
本文报道了一种识别史前寄生虫感染的方法,该方法将传统形态学方法与分子方法相结合。这种方法兼具了每种方法的优点,同时减轻了其局限性。为证明该方法的有效性,我们提供了一个案例研究,样本来自墨西哥杜兰戈州里奥萨佩附近奇基托斯死人洞穴考古遗址的一份有1400年历史的干燥粪便样本。传统制备的显微镜载玻片经过显微镜检查,初步鉴定出似蛔虫。记录了有关寄生虫发育阶段的信息。然后直接从载玻片材料中提取DNA。从该DNA提取物中,针对特定于其及其系统发育近亲的18S核糖体RNA基因变体的一小段进行PCR扩增和测序。DNA序列的系统发育分析与泡翼线虫属的一个成员最匹配,而不是蛔虫,只有一个与……匹配的例外。对原始复水粪化石材料的后续提取、扩增和测序证实了这些结果。该序列代表了一个系统发育异常,后续分析确定该序列是BLAST数据库中的一个错误,可能归因于测序和提交前幼体标本的错误鉴定。泡翼线虫属在形态上很难鉴定,并且会带来重大健康负担。它们在人类中的报告可能不足,部分原因是与更常见的蛔虫属人类寄生虫在形态上相似。我们得出结论,将传统形态学方法与分子方法相结合有助于解决当代和史前人群中的这个问题。