• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二元观察沟通量表(DOCS)的信度和效度

Reliability and Validity of the Dyadic Observed Communication Scale (DOCS).

作者信息

Hadley Wendy, Stewart Angela, Hunter Heather L, Affleck Katelyn, Donenberg Geri, Diclemente Ralph, Brown Larry K

机构信息

Bradley/Hasbro Children's Research Center/Rhode Island Hospital and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903.

出版信息

J Child Fam Stud. 2013 Feb;22(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9577-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10826-012-9577-1
PMID:23645977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3639442/
Abstract

We evaluated the reliability and validity of the Dyadic Observed Communication Scale (DOCS) coding scheme, which was developed to capture a range of communication components between parents and adolescents. Adolescents and their caregivers were recruited from mental health facilities for participation in a large, multi-site family-based HIV prevention intervention study. Seventy-one dyads were randomly selected from the larger study sample and coded using the DOCS at baseline. Preliminary validity and reliability of the DOCS was examined using various methods, such as comparing results to self-report measures and examining interrater reliability. Results suggest that the DOCS is a reliable and valid measure of observed communication among parent-adolescent dyads that captures both verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors that are typical intervention targets. The DOCS is a viable coding scheme for use by researchers and clinicians examining parent-adolescent communication. Coders can be trained to reliably capture individual and dyadic components of communication for parents and adolescents and this complex information can be obtained relatively quickly.

摘要

我们评估了二元观察沟通量表(DOCS)编码方案的信度和效度,该方案旨在捕捉父母与青少年之间一系列的沟通要素。青少年及其照顾者从心理健康机构招募而来,参与一项大型、多地点的基于家庭的艾滋病毒预防干预研究。从更大的研究样本中随机选取71对亲子,并在基线时使用DOCS进行编码。使用多种方法检验了DOCS的初步效度和信度,比如将结果与自我报告测量进行比较以及检验评分者间信度。结果表明,DOCS是一种可靠且有效的测量亲子二元组间观察到的沟通的方法,它能捕捉到言语和非言语沟通行为,而这些行为是典型的干预目标。DOCS是研究人员和临床医生用于检查亲子沟通的一种可行的编码方案。编码人员可以接受培训,以可靠地捕捉父母与青少年沟通的个体和二元要素,并且可以相对快速地获取这些复杂信息。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Dyadic Observed Communication Scale (DOCS).二元观察沟通量表(DOCS)的信度和效度
J Child Fam Stud. 2013 Feb;22(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9577-1.
2
Development and psychometric testing of the dyadic communication observational coding scheme in DEmentia care (DCODE): family dyadic communication in dementia.痴呆症护理中二元沟通观察编码方案(DCODE)的开发与心理测量测试:痴呆症中的家庭二元沟通
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;27(9):1770-1779. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2126819. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
The longitudinal impact of a family-based communication intervention on observational and self-reports of sexual communication.一项基于家庭的沟通干预对性沟通的观察和自我报告的纵向影响。
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Apr;27(4):1098-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0949-4. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Ease of use, feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the refined Cue Utilization and Engagement in Dementia (CUED) mealtime video-coding scheme.用于痴呆症的改良 Cue Utilization and Engagement in Dementia(CUED)进餐视频编码方案的易用性、可行性和评分者间信度。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3609-3622. doi: 10.1111/jan.14548. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Effects of a dyadic music therapy intervention on parent-child interaction, parent stress, and parent-child relationship in families with emotionally neglected children: a randomized controlled trial.二元音乐疗法干预对情感忽视儿童家庭中亲子互动、父母压力及亲子关系的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Music Ther. 2014 Winter;51(4):310-32. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thu028.
6
Psychometric properties of the disorders of consciousness scale.意识障碍量表的心理测量特性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1672-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 6.
7
Adolescent-Parent Dyadic Retention in an Interview Study and Changes in Willingness to Participate in a Hypothetical Microbicide Safety Study.一项访谈研究中的青少年-父母二元保留情况以及参与假设性杀微生物剂安全性研究的意愿变化
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Dec;31(6):592-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Adolescent and Parent Willingness to Participate in Microbicide Safety Studies.青少年及家长参与杀微生物剂安全性研究的意愿。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Feb;30(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
9
Association of Adolescent- and Parent-Reported Relationship Functioning with HIV Sexual Risk Among Adolescents in Botswana.博茨瓦纳青少年中青少年与家长报告的关系功能与艾滋病毒性风险的关联。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Mar;24(3):975-983. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02429-4.
10
Pilot randomized controlled trial of Tuning Relationships with Music: Intervention for parents with a trauma history and their adolescent.基于音乐的关系调整:干预有创伤史的父母及其青少年的随机对照试验
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Working through emotions: Sadness predicts social engagement and physiologic linkage for men and disengagement for women in dyadic interactions.通过情绪起作用:悲伤预示着在二元互动中男性的社交参与和生理联系,以及女性的社交脱离。
Emotion. 2025 Aug;25(5):1256-1272. doi: 10.1037/emo0001490. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Development of the Parent-Child Communication Quality Scale from the Perspective of Children's Psychological Needs.基于儿童心理需求视角的亲子沟通质量量表编制
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;14(10):933. doi: 10.3390/bs14100933.
3
A systematic review of the association between parent-child communication and adolescent mental health.关于亲子沟通与青少年心理健康之间关联的系统综述。
JCPP Adv. 2023 Nov 4;4(2):e12205. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12205. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
A Systematic Review of Parent-Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties.系统综述:亲子沟通测量工具:工具及其心理计量学特性。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;26(1):121-142. doi: 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
The longitudinal impact of a family-based communication intervention on observational and self-reports of sexual communication.一项基于家庭的沟通干预对性沟通的观察和自我报告的纵向影响。
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Apr;27(4):1098-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0949-4. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication and Adolescent Safer Sex Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.父母与青少年的性沟通及青少年更安全的性行为:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jan;170(1):52-61. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731.
7
Shaking up the system: the role of change in maternal-adolescent communication quality and adolescent weight loss.撼动系统:改变在母婴沟通质量及青少年体重减轻中所起的作用
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):121-31. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu073. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychiatric disorders and sexual risk among adolescents in mental health treatment.精神健康治疗中的青少年精神障碍和性风险。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Aug;78(4):590-7. doi: 10.1037/a0019632.
2
Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment.童年和青少年时期的直接和间接攻击行为:对性别差异、相互关系以及与适应不良关系的元分析综述
Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1185-229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.
3
Observing differences between healthy and unhealthy adolescent romantic relationships: substance abuse and interpersonal process.观察健康与不健康青少年恋爱关系之间的差异:药物滥用与人际过程。
J Adolesc. 2008 Dec;31(6):795-814. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
4
Family ecology and HIV sexual risk behaviors among African American and Puerto Rican adolescent males.非裔美国人和波多黎各青少年男性的家庭生态与艾滋病毒性行为风险
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2002 Apr;72(2):294-302. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.72.2.294.
5
A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech.儿童语言使用中性别差异的元分析综述:健谈性、亲和性言语及 assertive speech(此处可能有误,推测为“ assertive speech”,可译为“ assertive speech”,意为“ assertive speech”,可译为“自信言语”,具体需结合上下文确定准确含义)。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):993-1027. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.993.
6
Does parental involvement predict new sexually transmitted diseases in female adolescents?父母的参与能否预测女性青少年感染新的性传播疾病?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Jul;158(7):666-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.7.666.
7
Let's talk about sex: how comfortable discussions about sex impact teen sexual behavior.让我们谈谈性:关于性的舒适讨论如何影响青少年的性行为。
J Health Commun. 2003 Nov-Dec;8(6):583-98. doi: 10.1080/716100416.
8
Examining the relationship between adolescent sexual risk-taking and perceptions of monitoring, communication, and parenting styles.探究青少年性冒险行为与对监督、沟通及养育方式的认知之间的关系。
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Aug;33(2):71-8. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00141-1.
9
Individual and familial influences on the onset of sexual intercourse among urban African American adolescents.城市非裔美国青少年性行为开始的个体及家庭影响因素
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):159-67. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.159.
10
Holding the line with a watchful eye: the impact of perceived parental permissiveness and parental monitoring on risky sexual behavior among adolescents in psychiatric care.密切关注,坚守防线:感知到的父母放任与父母监督对接受精神科护理的青少年危险性行为的影响。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Apr;14(2):138-57. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.2.138.23899.