Suppr超能文献

健康信息交换与门诊医疗质量。

Health information exchange and ambulatory quality of care.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2012 May 30;3(2):197-209. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-02-RA-0005. Print 2012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health information exchange is a national priority, but there is limited evidence of its effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the effect of health information exchange on ambulatory quality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study over two years of 138 primary care physicians in small group practices in the Hudson Valley region of New York State. All physicians had access to an electronic portal, through which they could view clinical data (such as laboratory and radiology test results) for their patients over time, regardless of the ordering physician. We considered 15 quality measures that were being used by the community for a pay-for-performance program, as well as the subset of 8 measures expected to be affected by the portal. We adjusted for 11 physician characteristics (including health care quality at baseline).

RESULTS

Nearly half (43%) of the physicians were portal users. Non-users performed at or above the regional benchmark on 48% of the measures at baseline and 49% of the measures at followup (p = 0.58). Users performed at or above the regional benchmark on 57% of the measures at baseline and 64% at follow-up (p<0.001). Use of the portal was independently associated with higher quality of care at follow-up for those measures expected to be affected by the portal (p = 0.01), but not for those not expected to be affected by the portal (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an electronic portal for viewing clinical data was associated with modest improvements in ambulatory quality.

摘要

背景

健康信息交换是国家的重点,但目前其效果的证据有限。

目的

我们旨在确定健康信息交换对门诊质量的影响。

方法

我们对纽约州哈德逊谷地区的 138 名小团体执业的初级保健医生进行了为期两年的回顾性队列研究。所有医生都可以通过电子门户查看其患者的临床数据(例如实验室和放射学检查结果),无论开单医生是谁。我们考虑了 15 项正在社区中用于绩效付费计划的质量指标,以及预计受门户影响的 8 项指标子集。我们调整了 11 项医生特征(包括基线时的医疗保健质量)。

结果

近一半(43%)的医生是门户用户。非用户在基线时的 48%的措施和随访时的 49%的措施上达到或超过了区域基准(p = 0.58)。在基线时,用户在 57%的措施上达到或超过了区域基准,而在随访时则达到了 64%(p<0.001)。对于预计受门户影响的措施,使用门户与随访时的更高的护理质量独立相关(p = 0.01),但对于预计不受门户影响的措施则不相关(p = 0.12)。

结论

使用电子门户查看临床数据与门诊质量的适度改善有关。

相似文献

1
Health information exchange and ambulatory quality of care.健康信息交换与门诊医疗质量。
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 May 30;3(2):197-209. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-02-RA-0005. Print 2012.
3
Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care.电子健康记录与门诊医疗质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Apr;28(4):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

9
Data Content and Exchange in General Practice: a Review.全科医疗中的数据内容与交换:综述
Med Arch. 2014 Dec;68(6):414-418. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.414-418. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes.健康信息交换对健康结果的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Nov 30;2(4):499-507. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-05-R-0027. Print 2011.
3
The financial impact of health information exchange on emergency department care.健康信息交换对急诊护理的财务影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):328-33. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000394. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
7
Physicians' potential use and preferences related to health information exchange.医生在健康信息交换方面的潜在使用和偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Mar;80(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
8
Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange.医生对健康信息交换的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):60-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006502. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验