Suppr超能文献

群体间关系与健康差异:社会心理学视角

Intergroup relations and health disparities: a social psychological perspective.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2013 May;32(5):514-24. doi: 10.1037/a0030358.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article considers how the social psychology of intergroup processes helps to explain the presence and persistence of health disparities between members of socially advantaged and disadvantaged groups.

METHOD

Social psychological theory and research on intergroup relations, including prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, stigma, prejudice concerns, social identity threat, and the dynamics of intergroup interactions, is reviewed and applied to understand group disparities in health and health care. Potential directions for future research are considered.

RESULTS

Key features of group relations and dynamics, including social categorization, social hierarchy, and the structural positions of groups along dimensions of perceived warmth and competence, influence how members of high status groups perceive, feel about, and behave toward members of low status groups, how members of low status groups construe and cope with their situation, and how members of high and low status groups interact with each other. These intergroup processes, in turn, contribute to health disparities by leading to differential exposure to and experiences of chronic and acute stress, different health behaviors, and different quality of health care experienced by members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Within each of these pathways, social psychological theory and research identifies mediating mechanisms, moderating factors, and individual differences that can affect health.

CONCLUSIONS

A social psychological perspective illuminates the intergroup, interpersonal, and intrapersonal processes by which structural circumstances which differ between groups for historical, political, and economic reasons can lead to group differences in health.

摘要

目的

本文探讨了群体间过程的社会心理学如何帮助解释社会地位较高和较低群体成员之间存在和持续存在健康差距的原因。

方法

回顾了关于群体关系和动态的社会心理学理论和研究,包括偏见、歧视、刻板印象、污名、偏见关注、社会认同威胁以及群体间互动的动态,将其应用于理解健康和医疗保健方面的群体差异。考虑了未来研究的潜在方向。

结果

群体关系和动态的关键特征,包括社会分类、社会等级以及群体在感知温暖和能力维度上的结构位置,影响了高地位群体成员对低地位群体成员的感知、感受和行为方式,影响了低地位群体成员对自身处境的理解和应对方式,以及高地位和低地位群体成员之间的相互作用方式。这些群体间过程通过导致优势和劣势群体成员在慢性和急性压力、不同健康行为以及不同医疗质量方面的差异暴露和经历,从而导致健康差距。在这些途径中的每一条中,社会心理学理论和研究都确定了可以影响健康的中介机制、调节因素和个体差异。

结论

从社会心理学的角度出发,可以阐明由于历史、政治和经济原因而在群体之间存在的结构性差异导致健康方面的群体差异的群体间、人际间和个体间过程。

相似文献

1
Intergroup relations and health disparities: a social psychological perspective.
Health Psychol. 2013 May;32(5):514-24. doi: 10.1037/a0030358.
2
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
3
The social identity approach: Appraising the Tajfellian legacy.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):5-25. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12349. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
The Social Psychology of Intergroup Toleration.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;21(1):72-96. doi: 10.1177/1088868316640974. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
Intergroup bias.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:575-604. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109.
6
Toward a Social Psychology of Race and Race Relations for the Twenty-First Century.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:439-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033327. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
Role of information asymmetry and situational salience in reducing intergroup bias: the case of ultimatum games.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Dec;38(12):1671-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167212458327. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
10
Being similar versus being equal: intergroup similarity moderates the influence of in-group norms on discrimination and prejudice.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;48(Pt 2):253-73. doi: 10.1348/014466608X342943. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

2
Identity as a resource or a demand.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 28;20(1):e0318449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318449. eCollection 2025.
3
The Role of Interactional Processes in Mental Health Disparities: A Narrative Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Providers.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10025-5. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
5
Barriers to Adopting Healthy Lifestyle and Health Promotion among Ethnic Minority Bedouin Women in Southern Israel: A Qualitative Study.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun;12(3):1925-1936. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02022-z. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Racial differences in triage assessment at rural vs urban Maine emergency departments.
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;19(6):1733-1743. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03560-4. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HEALTH: How Much Does Stress Really Matter?
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Spring;8(1):95-113. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X11000087. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
2
Racial/ethnic socialization and identity development in Black families: the role of parent and youth reports.
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jul;50(7):1897-909. doi: 10.1037/a0036800. Epub 2014 May 5.
3
THE IMPACT OF RACISM ON CLINICIAN COGNITION, BEHAVIOR, AND CLINICAL DECISION MAKING.
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Apr 1;8(1):199-218. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X11000191.
4
Under the radar: how unexamined biases in decision-making processes in clinical interactions can contribute to health care disparities.
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):945-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300601. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students.
Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1447-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1198364.
8
From "in the air" to "under the skin": cortisol responses to social identity threat.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Feb;37(2):151-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167210392384.
9
Race and psychological distress: the South african stress and health study.
J Health Soc Behav. 2010 Dec;51(4):458-77. doi: 10.1177/0022146510386795.
10
Exploring the link between racial discrimination and substance use: what mediates? What buffers?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):785-801. doi: 10.1037/a0019880.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验