Wake Forest University, Schools of Business, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):579-92. doi: 10.1037/a0032809. Epub 2013 May 6.
We develop and test a model based on social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1991) that links abusive supervision to followers' ethical intentions and behaviors. Results from a sample of 2,572 military members show that abusive supervision was negatively related to followers' moral courage and their identification with the organization's core values. In addition, work unit contexts with varying degrees of abusive supervision, reflected by the average level of abusive supervision reported by unit members, moderated relationships between the level of abusive supervision personally experienced by individuals and both their moral courage and their identification with organizational values. Moral courage and identification with organizational values accounted for the relationship between abusive supervision and followers' ethical intentions and unethical behaviors. These findings suggest that abusive supervision may undermine moral agency and that being personally abused is not required for abusive supervision to negatively influence ethical outcomes.
我们基于社会认知理论(Bandura,1991)开发并检验了一个模型,该理论将虐待型领导与下属的道德意图和行为联系起来。对 2572 名军人的样本进行的结果表明,虐待型领导与下属的道德勇气和对组织核心价值观的认同呈负相关。此外,工作单位的背景各不相同,反映在单位成员报告的平均虐待型领导水平上,这种背景调节了个人经历的虐待型领导水平与他们的道德勇气和对组织价值观的认同之间的关系。道德勇气和对组织价值观的认同解释了虐待型领导与下属道德意图和不道德行为之间的关系。这些发现表明,虐待型领导可能会破坏道德能动性,而且个人受到虐待并不是虐待型领导对道德结果产生负面影响的必要条件。