Neuroscience Institute and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5030, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Jun;1288(1):17-35. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12109. Epub 2013 May 3.
Many historical and contemporary theorists have proposed that population-level behavioral and brain asymmetries are unique to humans and evolved as a consequence of human-specific adaptations such as language, tool manufacture and use, and bipedalism. Recent studies in nonhuman animals, notably primates, have begun to challenge this view. Here, I summarize comparative data on neuroanatomical asymmetries in the planum temporale (PT) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) of humans and chimpanzees, regions considered the morphological equivalents to Broca's and Wernicke's areas. I also review evidence of population-level handedness in captive and wild chimpanzees. When similar methods and landmarks are used to define the PT and IFG, humans and chimpanzees show similar patterns of asymmetry in both cortical regions, though humans show more pronounced directional biases. Similarly, there is good evidence that chimpanzees show population-level handedness, though, again, the expression of handedness is less robust compared to humans. These results stand in contrast to reported claims of significant differences in the distribution of handedness in humans and chimpanzees, and I discuss some possible explanations for the discrepancies in the neuroanatomical and behavioral data.
许多历史和当代的理论家提出,群体水平的行为和大脑不对称性是人类独有的,是人类特有的适应进化的结果,如语言、工具制造和使用以及两足行走。最近在非人类动物,特别是灵长类动物中的研究开始挑战这一观点。在这里,我总结了人类和黑猩猩的颞上回(PT)和额下回(IFG)神经解剖学不对称的比较数据,这些区域被认为是布罗卡区和韦尼克区的形态等同物。我还回顾了关于圈养和野生黑猩猩群体水平偏手性的证据。当使用类似的方法和地标来定义 PT 和 IFG 时,人类和黑猩猩在这两个皮质区域都表现出相似的不对称模式,尽管人类表现出更明显的方向性偏倚。同样,有充分的证据表明黑猩猩表现出群体水平的偏手性,尽管与人类相比,偏手性的表达不那么明显。这些结果与人类和黑猩猩在偏手性分布上存在显著差异的报告说法形成对比,我讨论了神经解剖学和行为数据差异的一些可能解释。