接受血液透析患者的弗雷明汉风险评分表现。

Performance of the Framingham risk score in patients receiving hemodialysis.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Nephrology (Carlton). 2013 Jul;18(7):510-5. doi: 10.1111/nep.12094.

Abstract

AIM

The Framingham Risk Score (FRS), calculated by considering conventional risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, was developed to predict coronary heart disease in various populations. However, reverse epidemiology has been raised concerning these risk factors in predicting high cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients. Our objectives are to determine whether FRS is associated with overall and cardiovascular mortality and the role of new risk markers when they were added to a FRS model in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 201 hemodialysis patients aged 20-80 years old. The FRS is used to identify individuals categorized as low (<6% 10-year risk), intermediate (6-20% risk) or high risk (>20% risk). Medical records were reviewed to collect clinical information. Data of ankle-brachial index (ABI) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were obtained by an ABI-form device.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 4.4 ± 1.5 years. Intermediate risk predicted overall hazard ratio (HR) (2.157, P = 0.039) and cardiovascular mortality (HR= 5.023; P = 0.004) versus low risk, but 'high' risk did not. High risk (vs low risk) predicted cardiovascular events (HR = 2.458, P = 0.05). Besides, the addition of ABI < 0.9 (P = 0.021) and baPWV (P = 0.014) to a FRS model significantly improved the predictive value for overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

In hemodialysis patients, intermediate risk but not high risk categorization by FRS predicted overall and cardiovascular mortality, and high risk predicted cardiovascular events. ABI < 0.9 and baPWV provided additional predictive values for overall mortality. Future study is needed to develop hemodialysis-specific equations and assess whether risk refinement using ABI < 0.9 and baPWV leads to a meaningful change in clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)通过考虑心血管疾病的传统危险因素来预测各种人群的冠心病。然而,这些危险因素在预测血液透析患者高心血管死亡率方面存在反向流行病学。我们的目的是确定 FRS 是否与全因和心血管死亡率相关,以及在将新的风险标志物添加到 FRS 模型中时,它们在血液透析患者中的作用。

方法

本研究纳入了 201 名年龄在 20-80 岁之间的血液透析患者。FRS 用于确定低危(<6%10 年风险)、中危(6-20%风险)或高危(>20%风险)患者。回顾病历以收集临床信息。通过 ABI 设备获得踝臂指数(ABI)和臂踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)的数据。

结果

平均随访时间为 4.4±1.5 年。中危预测全因危险比(HR)(2.157,P=0.039)和心血管死亡率(HR=5.023;P=0.004)高于低危,但高危(HR=2.458,P=0.05)则无。此外,ABI<0.9(P=0.021)和 baPWV(P=0.014)的加入显著提高了 FRS 模型对全因死亡率的预测价值。

结论

在血液透析患者中,FRS 的中危而非高危分类预测全因和心血管死亡率,而高危预测心血管事件。ABI<0.9 和 baPWV 为全因死亡率提供了额外的预测价值。需要进一步研究开发血液透析特异性方程,并评估使用 ABI<0.9 和 baPWV 进行风险细化是否会导致临床结局的显著改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索