• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 比多排 CT 在肝癌根治性治疗决策中的作用更好。

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is better than MDCT in decision making of curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):2893-900. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3001-y. Epub 2013 May 7.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-3001-y
PMID:23649931
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed the change in the therapeutic decision among curative treatments after adding Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to triple-phase MDCT for patients with early-stage HCC.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated two groups: 33 pathologically confirmed HCC patients after liver transplantation in group 1; 34 HCC patients without pathology in group 2. In group 1, we simulated the therapeutic decision-making process by pretransplant MDCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. In group 2, including the 34 early-stage HCC patients consecutively enrolled, we investigated the change of therapeutic decision after adding Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to MDCT.

RESULTS

In the simulation from group 1, after adding Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, 33.3% (11/33 patients) of treatment decisions were changed from the decision based on MDCT alone. Among 22 patients considered eligible for resection and 33 patients for radiofrequency ablation, the therapeutic decision was changed for 10 patients in the surgical group and 4 patients for the RFA group (45.5 and 12.1%). In group 2, the rate of change in the therapeutic decision after adding Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to MDCT was 41.2% (14/34 patients). In group 1 with explants pathology, the median diameter of HCCs not detected by MDCT but detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was 1.15 cm (0.3-3.0 cm). The median diameter of HCCs seen only in the explanted liver was 1.0 cm (0.3-1.7 cm), and 60.7% of them were well-differentiated HCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that performing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI before deciding on curative treatment for early-stage HCC may improve the accuracy of treatment decision for early-stage HCC.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在三阶段 MDCT 中加入钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 后,对早期 HCC 患者进行根治性治疗的治疗决策变化。

方法

本研究回顾性调查了两组患者:第 1 组为 33 例经肝移植术后病理证实的 HCC 患者;第 2 组为 34 例无病理 HCC 患者。在第 1 组中,我们通过移植前 MDCT 和 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 模拟治疗决策过程。在第 2 组中,包括连续纳入的 34 例早期 HCC 患者,我们研究了在 MDCT 中加入 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 后治疗决策的变化。

结果

在第 1 组的模拟中,在加入 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 后,33.3%(33 例患者中的 11 例)的治疗决策从单纯基于 MDCT 的决策改变。在 22 例被认为适合手术切除和 33 例适合射频消融的患者中,手术组中有 10 例和 RFA 组中有 4 例(45.5%和 12.1%)的治疗决策发生改变。在第 2 组中,在 MDCT 中加入 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 后,治疗决策改变的比例为 41.2%(34 例患者中的 14 例)。在有肝移植标本病理的第 1 组中,MDCT 未检出但 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 检出的 HCC 的中位直径为 1.15cm(0.3-3.0cm)。仅在肝移植标本中可见的 HCC 的中位直径为 1.0cm(0.3-1.7cm),其中 60.7%为高分化 HCC。

结论

本研究表明,在决定早期 HCC 的根治性治疗前进行 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 可能会提高早期 HCC 治疗决策的准确性。

相似文献

1
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is better than MDCT in decision making of curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 比多排 CT 在肝癌根治性治疗决策中的作用更好。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):2893-900. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3001-y. Epub 2013 May 7.
2
Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging outperformed multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在诊断小肝细胞癌方面优于多排螺旋 CT:一项荟萃分析。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Dec;23(12):1505-1518. doi: 10.1002/lt.24867.
3
Health economic evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI vs ECCM-MRI and multi-detector computed tomography in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand and South Korea.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI)与肝细胞特异性对比剂增强磁共振成像(ECCM-MRI)及多排螺旋计算机断层扫描在泰国和韩国疑似肝细胞癌患者中的卫生经济学评价
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):759-68. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1171230. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Assessment of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for HCC and dysplastic nodules and comparison of detection sensitivity versus MDCT.钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 对 HCC 和异型增生结节的评估及其与 MDCT 的检测灵敏度比较。
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;47(9):1036-47. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0571-6. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Differences in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Liver Cancer by Multi-Row Spiral CTMDCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI.多排螺旋 CT 和 Gd-EOB-DTPA 增强 MRI 在早期肝细胞肝癌患者诊断和治疗中的差异。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):31-35.
6
Clinical Impact of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Living Donor Liver Transplant.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像对活体肝移植的临床影响
Transplant Proc. 2022 Mar;54(2):386-390. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.09.071. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Diagnostic capability of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with multi-detector CT.钆塞酸二钠增强肝脏磁共振成像对肝细胞癌的诊断能力:与多排螺旋CT的比较
Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2013 Sep;62(3):55-61.
8
Clinical Impact of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Hepatoma Management: A Prospective Study.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像对肝癌治疗的临床影响:一项前瞻性研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Apr;61(4):1197-205. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3989-x. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Presence of non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者钆乙氧基苄基二乙三胺五乙酸增强磁共振成像上非高血管性低信号结节的存在情况
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;32(4):908-915. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13622.
10
Non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as a predictor of outcomes for early-stage HCC.钆塞酸二钠增强MRI上的非高血供低信号结节作为早期肝癌预后的预测指标
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jan;9(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9553-5. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI proves advantageous in selecting surgical candidates for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis in terms of oncological outcomes.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在为早期肝细胞癌患者选择手术候选者方面具有优势:一项基于肿瘤学结局的分析。
ILIVER. 2024 Sep 18;3(4):100117. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2024.100117. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies.多学科策略时代的肝细胞癌外科治疗
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar;30(3):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02703-7. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Induction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Conventional Domestic Swine Using N-Diethylnitrosamine and Phenobarbital.
使用N-二乙基亚硝胺和苯巴比妥在传统家猪中诱导肝细胞癌
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Mar 25;16:245-257. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S439787. eCollection 2024.
4
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition).原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)
Liver Cancer. 2023 Apr 5;12(5):405-444. doi: 10.1159/000530495. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Consensus report from the 10th Global Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging: developments in HCC management.第十届全球肝脏磁共振成像论坛共识报告:肝癌管理的新进展。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):9152-9166. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09928-y. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment.钆塞酸增强肝脏磁共振成像在局部治疗后肝细胞癌评估中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 14;28(26):3116-3131. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i26.3116.
7
Contrast Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging: Value and Progression.用于肝细胞癌成像的对比剂:价值与进展
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 2;12:921667. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.921667. eCollection 2022.
8
Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI as a Diagnostic Tool in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Report from a 2020 Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Expert Meeting.钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 在肝细胞癌管理中的诊断工具作用:2020 年亚太多学科专家会议报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Jul;23(7):697-719. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0593. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2019 Edition).肝细胞癌诊疗指南(2019年版)
Liver Cancer. 2020 Dec;9(6):682-720. doi: 10.1159/000509424. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Interpretation of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (2019 edition) in China.《中国原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)》解读
Glob Health Med. 2020 Oct 31;2(5):306-311. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01051.