Berkeley Center for Health Technology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):921-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1119.
Two overarching frameworks compete to address the organizational ills of the health care system. One framework diagnoses lack of coordination and prescribes integration and global payment. The other diagnoses loss of focus and prescribes specialization and episode payment. This article, based on research and interviews, assesses how the two frameworks manifest themselves at two high-volume orthopedic hospitals in Irvine, California. The Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center is part of a large and diversified health system. The Hoag Orthopedic Institute is a single-specialty facility jointly owned by the physicians and the hospital. Market outcomes, such as the merger of the Hoag specialty hospital into a larger diversified health system, suggest that Kaiser's focus on coordination of patient care from preadmission to postdischarge is a key factor in its success. But Hoag's specialization also leads to improved efficiencies. The integrated approach appears to be prevailing. At the same time, large diversified organizations might obtain further efficiencies by pursuing service-line strategies as described in this article--for instance, by providing incentives for efficiency and quality for each specialty and type of care.
两种总体框架竞相解决医疗体系的组织弊病。一个框架将缺乏协调作为病因,并开出整合和全球支付的药方。另一个则将注意力不集中作为病因,并开出专业化和单病种支付的药方。本文基于研究和访谈,评估了这两种框架在加利福尼亚州欧文市两家高容量骨科医院的表现。凯萨永久医疗集团欧文医疗中心是一个大型多元化医疗体系的一部分。霍格骨科研究所是由医生和医院共同拥有的单一专科医疗机构。市场结果,如霍格专科医院与更大的多元化医疗体系合并,表明凯萨专注于从入院前到出院后的患者护理协调是其成功的关键因素。但是,霍格的专业化也带来了效率的提高。综合方法似乎占了上风。与此同时,大型多元化组织可能通过实施本文所述的服务线策略获得进一步的效率——例如,为每个专科和护理类型提供效率和质量激励。