• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为一名记忆专家证人:三个案例。

On being a memory expert witness: Three cases.

作者信息

Conway Martin A

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , City University London , UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2013 Jul;21(5):566-575. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.794241. Epub 2013 May 7.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2013.794241
PMID:23651097
Abstract

I describe three legal cases in which I acted as a memory expert witness. The cases contain remarkable accounts of memories. Such memories are by no means unusual in legal cases, are often over retention intervals measured in decades, and contain details the specificity of which is highly unusual. For example, recalling from childhood verbatim conversations, clothes worn by self and others, the weather, actions that at the time could not have been understood, details that could not have been known, precise durations and calendar dates, and much more. I show how our scientific understanding of memory can help courts reach more informed decisions about such fantastical "memories" and how these memories constitute data that as researchers we should seek to understand.

摘要

我描述了三个我作为记忆专家证人参与的法律案件。这些案件包含了关于记忆的非凡描述。此类记忆在法律案件中绝非罕见,其保留间隔往往长达数十年,且包含细节,这些细节的特异性非常罕见。例如,能逐字回忆起童年时的对话、自己和他人当时所穿的衣服、天气、当时无法理解的行为、不可能知道的细节、精确的持续时间和日历日期等等。我展示了我们对记忆的科学理解如何能够帮助法庭就此类奇异的“记忆”做出更明智的决定,以及这些记忆如何构成了作为研究人员我们应该努力去理解的数据。

相似文献

1
On being a memory expert witness: Three cases.作为一名记忆专家证人:三个案例。
Memory. 2013 Jul;21(5):566-575. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.794241. Epub 2013 May 7.
2
Adult recollections of childhood memories: What details can be recalled?成年人对童年记忆的回忆:能回想起哪些细节?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1249-61. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.856451. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
3
Memory lessons from the courtroom: Reflections on being a memory expert on the witness stand.法庭上的记忆课:关于成为证人席上的记忆专家的思考。
Memory. 2013 Jul;21(5):576-583. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.725735. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
4
Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.专家证词会影响涉及童年性虐待恢复记忆的刑事审判中陪审员的决定。
J Child Sex Abus. 2013;22(8):949-67. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2013.839592.
5
A Case Concerning Children's False Memories of Abuse: Recommendations Regarding Expert Witness Work.一个关于儿童对虐待的错误记忆的案例:关于专家证人工作的建议
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Oct 3;24(3):365-378. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924. eCollection 2017.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Music evokes vivid autobiographical memories.音乐唤起生动的自传式记忆。
Memory. 2016 Aug;24(7):979-89. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1061012. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
8
Memories of childhood abuse: dissociation, amnesia, and corroboration.童年期虐待的记忆:分离、失忆与确证。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 May;156(5):749-55. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.5.749.
9
Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.心理学专家证人证言与司法决策趋势。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Dec;42-43:149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
The retrieval of self-defining memories is associated with the activation of specific working selves.自我定义记忆的提取与特定工作自我的激活相关联。
Memory. 2015;23(2):233-53. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.882955. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the effects of mood and emotional valence on the creation of false autobiographical memories.考察情绪和情感效价对错误自传体记忆形成的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01697-x.
2
Creating Memories for False Autobiographical Events in Childhood: A Systematic Review.童年虚假自传事件的记忆构建:一项系统综述
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-23. doi: 10.1002/acp.3220. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: lessons from the past and their modern consequences.司法程序中记忆的不可靠性:过去的教训及其现代影响。
Memory. 2015;23(5):633-56. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1010709. Epub 2015 Feb 23.