Suppr超能文献

一个关于儿童对虐待的错误记忆的案例:关于专家证人工作的建议

A Case Concerning Children's False Memories of Abuse: Recommendations Regarding Expert Witness Work.

作者信息

Otgaar Henry, de Ruiter Corine, Howe Mark L, Hoetmer Lisanne, van Reekum Patricia

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.

City University of London, UK.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Oct 3;24(3):365-378. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Expert witnesses can play a major role in legal cases concerning the reliability of statements. Abuse cases frequently contain only the memories of eyewitnesses/victims without the presence of physical evidence. Here, it is of the utmost importance that expert witnesses use scientific evidence for their expert opinion. In this case report, a case is described in which 20 children reported being sexually abused by the same teachers at their elementary school. The investigative steps that were taken by the police and school authorities are reviewed, including how they probably affected memory. In order to provide a sound expert opinion regarding the reliability of these statements, three recommendations are proposed. To reduce the effect of confirmation bias and increase objectivity, it is argued that expert witnesses' reports should contain alternative scenarios, be checked by another expert, and focus on the origin and context of the first statement.

摘要

专家证人在涉及陈述可靠性的法律案件中可发挥重要作用。虐待案件通常仅包含目击者/受害者的记忆,而没有实物证据。在此,专家证人将科学证据用于其专家意见极为重要。在本病例报告中,描述了一个案例,其中20名儿童报告在其小学被同一名教师性虐待。回顾了警方和学校当局采取的调查步骤,包括这些步骤可能如何影响记忆。为了就这些陈述的可靠性提供合理的专家意见,提出了三项建议。为了减少确认偏差的影响并提高客观性,有人认为专家证人的报告应包含其他可能情况,由另一位专家进行核查,并关注第一份陈述的来源和背景。

相似文献

3
When Children are the Least Vulnerable to False Memories: A True Report or a Case of Autosuggestion?
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61 Suppl 1:S271-5. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12926. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
10
On being an expert witness in sexual and reproductive health.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Apr;43(2):151-153. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101385. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the validity of testimony: The role of the order of evidence.评估证词的有效性:证据顺序的作用。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Nov 21;9:100562. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100562. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
When Children are the Least Vulnerable to False Memories: A True Report or a Case of Autosuggestion?
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61 Suppl 1:S271-5. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12926. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research.纯粹确证性研究议程
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463078.
7
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?鉴定专家是否会因为聘请他们的一方而产生偏见?
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1889-97. doi: 10.1177/0956797613481812. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验