Orgera Gianluigi, Krokidis Miltiadis, Matteoli Marco, Varano Gianluca Maria, La Verde Giacinto, David Vincenzo, Rossi Michele
Department of Radiology, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Feb;37(1):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0624-0. Epub 2013 May 8.
This study was designed to investigate the added role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to vertebroplasty on the pain management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
Thirty-six patients (51-82 years) with vertebral localization of MM were randomly divided into two groups: 18 patients (group A) who underwent RFA and then vertebroplasty, and 18 patients (group B) who underwent only vertebroplasty. Primary endpoints were technical success and pain relief score rate measured by the visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ); secondary endpoint was the amount of administered analgesia. Survival and complications were compared.
Technical success was 100 % in both groups. The VAS score (at 24 h and 6 weeks postprocedure) decreased in equal manner for both groups from a mean of 9.1-3.4 and 2.0 for group A and from a mean of 9.3-3.0 and 2.3 for group B; RMQ mean score was 19.8 for group A and 19.9 for group B and decreased to a mean of 9.6 and 8.2 for group A and 9.5 and 8.7 for group B. The amount of medication was equally decreased in the two groups. No statistically significant difference was noted. No major complication occurred and two patients died from other causes.
The use of percutaneous vertebroplasty alone appears to be effective for the pain management of the patients with vertebral involvement of multiple myeloma. The use of RFA that includes cost and time does not offer any clear added benefit on the midterm pain management of such patients.
本研究旨在探讨射频消融(RFA)联合椎体成形术在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者疼痛管理中的附加作用。
36例(51 - 82岁)椎体受累的MM患者随机分为两组:18例患者(A组)先接受RFA然后进行椎体成形术,18例患者(B组)仅接受椎体成形术。主要终点是技术成功率以及通过视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和罗兰 - 莫里斯问卷(RMQ)测量的疼痛缓解评分率;次要终点是镇痛药物的使用量。比较两组的生存率和并发症情况。
两组的技术成功率均为100%。两组的VAS评分(术后24小时和6周)均以相同方式下降,A组从平均9.1降至3.4和2.0,B组从平均9.3降至3.0和2.3;A组RMQ平均评分为19.8,B组为19.9,A组降至平均9.6和8.2,B组降至平均9.5和8.7。两组的药物使用量均同等减少。未观察到统计学上的显著差异。未发生重大并发症,2例患者死于其他原因。
单独使用经皮椎体成形术似乎对多发性骨髓瘤椎体受累患者的疼痛管理有效。包括成本和时间在内,RFA的使用在此类患者的中期疼痛管理中未提供任何明显的附加益处。