Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406 Jiefang South Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2942-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3025-4. Epub 2013 May 8.
Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is considered standard management for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. However, controversy exists regarding whether to use an isolated lateral entry or a crossed medial and lateral pinning technique.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare (1) the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury caused by pin fixation, (2) the quality of fracture reduction in terms of the radiographic outcomes, and (3) function in terms of criteria of Flynn et al. and elbow ROM, and other surgical complications caused by pin fixation.
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and other unpublished studies without language restriction. Seven RCTs involving 521 patients were included. Two authors independently assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies with use of the Detsky score. The median Detsky quality score of the included trials was 15.7 points. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios (RRs) or risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous data were measured as mean differences with 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was formally tested with standard chi-square test and I(2) statistic. For the primary objective, a funnel plot of the primary end point and Egger's test were performed to detect publication bias.
The pooled RR suggested that iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was higher with the crossed pinning technique than with the lateral entry technique (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89). No publication bias was further detected. There were no statistical differences in radiographic outcomes, function, and other surgical complications. No significant heterogeneity was found in these pooled results.
We conclude that the crossed pinning fixation is more at risk for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury than the lateral pinning technique. Therefore, we recommend the lateral pinning technique for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
闭合复位和经皮克氏针固定被认为是儿童肱骨髁上骨折的标准治疗方法。然而,对于是否使用单独的外侧入路还是交叉内外侧克氏针固定技术仍存在争议。
问题/目的:我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以比较(1)克氏针固定引起医源性尺神经损伤的风险,(2)影像学结果的骨折复位质量,以及(3)Flynn 等标准的功能和肘部 ROM,以及克氏针固定引起的其他手术并发症。
我们在没有语言限制的情况下,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和其他未发表的研究。纳入了 7 项 RCT 研究,共 521 名患者。两位作者独立使用 Detsky 评分评估纳入研究的方法学质量。纳入试验的 Detsky 质量评分中位数为 15.7 分。二项变量以风险比(RR)或风险差(95%置信区间(CI)表示,连续数据以均值差(95%CI)表示。使用标准的卡方检验和 I(2)统计量正式检验研究之间的统计学异质性。对于主要终点,进行漏斗图和 Egger 检验以检测发表偏倚。
汇总 RR 表明,交叉克氏针固定技术比外侧入路技术更容易发生医源性尺神经损伤(RR,0.30;95%CI,0.10-0.89)。进一步未发现发表偏倚。影像学结果、功能和其他手术并发症方面无统计学差异。这些汇总结果没有明显的异质性。
我们的结论是,交叉克氏针固定技术比外侧克氏针固定技术更容易发生医源性尺神经损伤。因此,我们建议儿童肱骨髁上骨折采用外侧克氏针固定技术。