Suppr超能文献

小儿肱骨髁上骨折外侧入路与交叉克氏针固定术的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of lateral entry with crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Na Yuyan, Bai Rui, Zhao Zhenqun, Han Changxu, Kong Lingyue, Ren Yizhong, Liu Wanlin

机构信息

Department of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010030, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010030, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 3;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0768-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for severe displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture (SCHF) is closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. However, controversy persists concerning the optimal pin fixation technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy on the configuration of lateral entry only with crossed entry pin fixation for SCHF, including Gartland type II and type III fractures in children.

METHODS

Published literatures, including retrospective studies, prospective studies, and randomized controlled trials, presenting the probability of poor functional consequence of elbow and/or loss of reduction and/or iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and/or superficial infection and/or cubitus varus were included. Statistical analysis was performed with the Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in the present meta-analysis involving 1163 patients with lateral entry pins and 1059 patients with crossed entry pins. An excellent score of Flynn criteria occurred more commonly in patients who treated with crossed pins than in patients with lateral pins only (RR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99; P = 0.03). In accordance with previous systematic review, the incidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in crossed entry group was significantly more than in lateral entry group with statistical difference (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.14-0.47; P < 0.0001). And, results of subgroup analysis on iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury based on experimental design of retrospective study (RR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.10-0.52; P < 0.0004) and randomized control trial (RR = 0.29; 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P < 0.02) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In consideration of the contradictoriness of lateral entry with two pins only (possible risk of poor functional consequence of elbow) and crossed entry pins (risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury), the recommended strategy for the treatment of SCHF is the lateral entry technique with introducing divergent three pins which can provide a stable configuration and avoid the injury of the ulnar nerve. And additional protective measures for the ulnar nerve should be taken by surgeons that wish for the more stable structure with the crossed entry technique.

摘要

背景

儿童严重移位型肱骨髁上骨折(SCHF)的标准治疗方法是闭合复位及经皮穿针固定。然而,关于最佳穿针固定技术仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较单纯外侧入路与交叉入路穿针固定治疗SCHF(包括儿童Gartland II型和III型骨折)的安全性和有效性。

方法

纳入已发表的文献,包括回顾性研究、前瞻性研究和随机对照试验,这些文献报道了肘关节功能不良后果、复位丢失、医源性尺神经损伤、浅表感染和肘内翻的发生概率。使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行统计分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了24项研究,涉及1163例采用外侧入路穿针的患者和1059例采用交叉入路穿针的患者。采用交叉穿针治疗的患者Flynn标准评分优秀的情况比仅采用外侧穿针的患者更常见(RR = 0.93;95%CI 0.87 - 0.99;P = 0.03)。与先前的系统评价一致,交叉入路组医源性尺神经损伤的发生率显著高于外侧入路组,差异有统计学意义(RR = 0.26;95%CI 0.14 - 0.47;P < 0.0001)。并且,基于回顾性研究(RR = 0.23;95%CI 0.10 - 0.52;P < 0.0004)和随机对照试验(RR = 0.29;95%CI 0.10 - 0.79;P < 0.02)的实验设计对医源性尺神经损伤进行亚组分析的结果相似。

结论

考虑到单纯外侧双针入路(可能存在肘关节功能不良后果的风险)和交叉入路穿针(医源性尺神经损伤风险)的矛盾性,治疗SCHF的推荐策略是采用外侧入路并引入发散的三针,这样可以提供稳定的构型并避免尺神经损伤。对于希望采用交叉入路技术获得更稳定结构的外科医生,应采取额外的尺神经保护措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验