Inserm, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Biostatistics Team, F-94807, Villejuif, France.
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 15;32(18):3206-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.5755.
Competing risks arise when patients may fail from several causes. Strategies for modeling event-specific quantities often assume that the cause of failure is known for all patients, but this is seldom the case. Several authors have addressed the problem of modeling the cause-specific hazard rates with missing causes of failure. In contrast, direct modeling of the cumulative incidence function has received little attention.We provide a general framework for regression modeling of this function in the missing cause setting, encompassing key models such as the Fine and Gray and additive models, by considering two extensions of the Andersen–Klein pseudo-value approach. The first extension is a novel inverse probability weighting method, whereas the second extension is based on a previously proposed multiple imputation procedure.We evaluated the gain in using these approaches with small samples in an extensive simulation study. We analyzed the data from an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group breast cancer treatment clinical trial to illustrate the practical value and ease of implementation of the proposed methods.
当患者可能因多种原因而失败时,就会出现竞争风险。用于对特定事件数量进行建模的策略通常假设所有患者的失败原因都已知,但这种情况很少见。一些作者已经解决了在失败原因缺失的情况下对特定原因风险率进行建模的问题。相比之下,对累积发生率函数的直接建模却很少受到关注。我们提供了一种在缺失原因情况下对该函数进行回归建模的通用框架,通过考虑 Andersen-Klein 伪值方法的两个扩展,包含 Fine and Gray 和加法模型等关键模型。第一个扩展是一种新颖的逆概率加权方法,而第二个扩展则基于之前提出的多重插补程序。我们在一项广泛的模拟研究中评估了使用这些方法在小样本中的收益。我们分析了来自东部肿瘤协作组乳腺癌治疗临床试验的数据,以说明所提出方法的实际价值和易于实施性。