Senkevitch Emilee, Smith Ann C, Marbach-Ad Gili, Song Wenxia
Department of Cell Biology & Molecular Genetics, College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011 Dec 1;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.319. Print 2011.
Here we describe a semester-long, multipart activity called "Read and wRite to reveal the Research process" (R(3)) that was designed to teach students the elements of a scientific research paper. We implemented R(3) in an advanced immunology course. In R(3), we paralleled the activities of reading, discussion, and presentation of relevant immunology work from primary research papers with student writing, discussion, and presentation of their own lab findings. We used reading, discussing, and writing activities to introduce students to the rationale for basic components of a scientific research paper, the method of composing a scientific paper, and the applications of course content to scientific research. As a final part of R(3), students worked collaboratively to construct a Group Research Paper that reported on a hypothesis-driven research project, followed by a peer review activity that mimicked the last stage of the scientific publishing process. Assessment of student learning revealed a statistically significant gain in student performance on writing in the style of a research paper from the start of the semester to the end of the semester.
在此,我们描述了一项为期一学期的多部分活动,名为“阅读与写作以揭示研究过程”(R(3)),该活动旨在教授学生科研论文的要素。我们在一门高级免疫学课程中实施了R(3)。在R(3)中,我们将阅读、讨论和展示来自原始研究论文的相关免疫学工作的活动,与学生撰写、讨论和展示他们自己的实验室研究结果的活动并行开展。我们通过阅读、讨论和写作活动,向学生介绍科研论文基本组成部分的原理、撰写科研论文的方法以及课程内容在科研中的应用。作为R(3)的最后一部分,学生们合作撰写一篇小组研究论文,报告一个假设驱动的研究项目,随后进行一次模拟科学出版过程最后阶段的同行评审活动。对学生学习情况的评估显示,从学期开始到学期结束,学生在以科研论文风格写作方面的表现有统计学意义上的显著提高。