Suppr超能文献

在一门基础实验课程中教授科学写作。

Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course.

作者信息

Holstein Sarah E, Mickley Steinmetz Katherine R, Miles John D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303;

Department of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303; ; Program in Neuroscience, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303;

出版信息

J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A101-9. eCollection 2015 Spring.

Abstract

One challenge that many neuroscience instructors face is how to teach students to communicate within the field. The goal of this project was to improve students' scientific writing in an introductory psychology laboratory course that serves as a feeder course into the neuroscience curriculum. This course included a scaffolded approach - breaking assignments into different sections that build upon each other to allow for more direction and feedback on each section. Students were also provided with examples of scientific writing, given direction on finding and reading journal articles, and were taught how to effectively peer review a paper. Research papers were assessed before (Year 1) and after (Year 2) this scaffolded approach was instituted. The assessment included measures of "Genre Knowledge" for each section of a research paper (abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion) as well as measures of "Writing Elements" (grammar, formatting, clarity, transitions, building to the hypothesis, using evidence). The results indicated that there was an improvement for Genre Knowledge scores when comparing Year 1 to Year 2. However, there was no systematic improvement in Writing Elements. This suggests that this teaching technique was most effective in improving students' ability to write within the scientific genre. The logistics of implementing such an approach are discussed.

摘要

许多神经科学教师面临的一个挑战是如何教授学生在该领域内进行交流。本项目的目标是在一门心理学入门实验课程中提高学生的科学写作能力,该课程是神经科学课程的预备课程。本课程采用了一种循序渐进的方法——将作业分成不同的部分,各部分相互衔接,以便对每个部分提供更多的指导和反馈。还向学生提供了科学写作的示例,指导他们如何查找和阅读期刊文章,并教授他们如何有效地进行论文同行评审。在采用这种循序渐进的方法之前(第1年)和之后(第2年)对研究论文进行了评估。评估包括对研究论文各部分(摘要、引言、方法、结果、讨论)进行“体裁知识”测量,以及对“写作要素”(语法、格式、清晰度、过渡、提出假设、使用证据)进行测量。结果表明,将第1年与第2年进行比较时,体裁知识得分有所提高。然而,写作要素方面没有系统性的改进。这表明这种教学技巧在提高学生在科学体裁内写作的能力方面最为有效。文中还讨论了实施这种方法的相关事宜。

相似文献

1
Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course.在一门基础实验课程中教授科学写作。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A101-9. eCollection 2015 Spring.
7
Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing.同行评审教学与科学写作过程。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2001 Dec;25(1-4):167-75. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167.
8
Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.浅析以同伴互教模式提升医学生笔记技能
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Aug-Sep;34(4):425-433. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730182. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Women are more likely to wear red or pink at peak fertility.女性在生育高峰期更倾向于穿红色或粉色。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1837-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797613476045. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
6
Helping students get into graduate school.帮助学生进入研究生院。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2004 Fall;3(1):A4-8. Epub 2004 Oct 15.
8
The utility of writing assignments in undergraduate bioscience.本科生物科学写作作业的实用性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Spring;11(1):39-46. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0058.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验