Schwaber E A
Int J Psychoanal. 1990;71 ( Pt 2):229-40.
There is a fundamental difference in outlook between an interpretive effort that attempts to help the patient arrive at a truth, the existence of which the analyst has implicitly pre-existing knowledge, and an interpretation that inherently derives from a question to which the analyst does not yet have an answer. Drawing upon a number of clinical examples, I have tried to illustrate this distinction, arguing that the latter outlook, though difficult to sustain, will lead to a methodology which more rigorously focuses on the patient's psychic reality as our sole preview. New vistas of human experience may then be opened to us that may not otherwise have been contemplated.
一种试图帮助患者得出真相的解释性努力（分析师对该真相的存在已隐含地预先知晓）与一种本质上源自分析师尚无答案的问题的解释之间，存在着根本的观点差异。借助多个临床实例，我试图阐释这种区别，并认为后一种观点虽难以维系，但将导向一种更严格地聚焦于患者心理现实作为我们唯一预设的方法。届时，我们或许会开启人类经验的新视野，而这些视野原本可能不会被考虑到。
