Mario Gomberoff J, Carmen Noemi C, Pualuan de Gomberoff L
Int J Psychoanal. 1990;71 ( Pt 2):249-59.
In this paper we examine the relationship of the autistic object concept to narcissism, and we attempt to delimit its chronological location. Then we refer to transferential and countertransferential relationships that appear when the autistic object arises within the analysis of nonpsychotic patients. We also discuss some clinical phenomena described in other ways by different authors, with characteristics very similar to those that we have termed autistic objects. We report the case of a patient whose analysis is arrested upon the appearance of the clinical phenomenon under study. The emergence of the austistic object demanded unusual manoeuvres for its removal and subsequent resumption of the process. Analyst and patient had shared--in transferential and countertransferential ways--the autistic object put forward by the patient. The verbal discourse precluded communication instead of making it possible. We used the model of the mental kaleidoscope to explain some of the clinical phenomena described.
在本文中,我们研究了自闭症客体概念与自恋的关系,并试图确定其在时间上的位置。然后我们探讨了在对非精神病患者的分析中出现自闭症客体时所呈现的移情和反移情关系。我们还讨论了不同作者以其他方式描述的一些临床现象,这些现象的特征与我们所称的自闭症客体非常相似。我们报告了一个病例,该患者的分析在我们所研究的临床现象出现时陷入停滞。自闭症客体的出现需要采取不同寻常的策略来消除它,并随后恢复分析过程。分析师和患者以移情和反移情的方式共同拥有了患者提出的自闭症客体。言语交流非但没有促成沟通,反而阻碍了沟通。我们使用心理万花筒模型来解释所描述的一些临床现象。