• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触足病医生是否能预防糖尿病患者下肢截肢的发生?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does contact with a podiatrist prevent the occurrence of a lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 May 8;3(5):e002331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002331.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002331
PMID:23657467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3651976/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of contact with a podiatrist on the occurrence of Lower Extremity Amputation (LEA) in people with diabetes.

DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review of available literature on the effect of contact with a podiatrist on the risk of LEA in people with diabetes. Eligible studies, published in English, were identified through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The key terms, 'podiatry', 'amputation' and 'diabetes', were searched as Medical Subject Heading terms. Reference lists of selected papers were hand-searched for additional articles. No date restrictions were imposed.

STUDY SELECTION

Published randomised and analytical observational studies of the effect of contact with a podiatrist on the risk of LEA in people with diabetes were included. Cross-sectional studies, review articles, chart reviews and case series were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts and full articles to identify eligible studies and extracted data related to the study design, characteristics of participants, interventions, outcomes, control for confounding factors and risk estimates.

ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis was performed separately for randomised and non-randomised studies. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were estimated with fixed and random effects models as appropriate.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria and five provided data included in meta-analysis. The identified studies were heterogenous in design and included people with diabetes at both low and high risk of amputation. Contact with a podiatrist did not significantly affect the RR of LEA in a meta-analysis of available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (1.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 9.78, 2 RCTs) or from cohort studies; (0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.33, 3 Cohort studies with four substudies in one cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

There are very limited data available on the effect of contact with a podiatrist on the risk of LEA in people with diabetes.

摘要

目的

确定与足病医生接触对糖尿病患者下肢截肢(LEA)发生的影响。

设计和数据来源

我们对有关与足病医生接触对糖尿病患者LEA 风险影响的现有文献进行了系统评价。通过对 PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库的搜索,确定了符合条件的以英文发表的研究。使用医学主题词搜索了“足病学”、“截肢”和“糖尿病”等关键词。对选定论文的参考文献进行了手工搜索,以查找其他文章。未对日期进行限制。

研究选择

纳入了已发表的关于与足病医生接触对糖尿病患者LEA 风险影响的随机和分析性观察研究。排除了横断面研究、综述文章、图表回顾和病例系列。两名评审员独立评估标题、摘要和全文,以确定符合条件的研究,并提取与研究设计、参与者特征、干预措施、结局、混杂因素控制和风险估计相关的数据。

分析

分别对随机和非随机研究进行了荟萃分析。适当情况下,使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型估计了相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

有 6 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 5 项提供了包含在荟萃分析中的数据。所确定的研究在设计上存在异质性,包括低截肢风险和高截肢风险的糖尿病患者。对来自随机对照试验(RCT)的现有数据进行荟萃分析(1.41,95%CI 0.20 至 9.78,2 项 RCT)或来自队列研究的荟萃分析(0.73,95%CI 0.39 至 1.33,3 项队列研究中有 4 项亚研究在一个队列中),并未显示与足病医生接触对 LEA 的 RR 有显著影响。

结论

关于与足病医生接触对糖尿病患者 LEA 风险的影响,现有数据非常有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/063db30d02ec/bmjopen2012002331f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/d9504ba8a565/bmjopen2012002331f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/787c00b4c961/bmjopen2012002331f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/063db30d02ec/bmjopen2012002331f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/d9504ba8a565/bmjopen2012002331f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/787c00b4c961/bmjopen2012002331f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1621/3651976/063db30d02ec/bmjopen2012002331f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Does contact with a podiatrist prevent the occurrence of a lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.接触足病医生是否能预防糖尿病患者下肢截肢的发生?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 8;3(5):e002331. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002331.
2
Comorbid depression and risk of lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病患者合并抑郁症与下肢截肢风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Aug 20;5(1):e000366. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000366. eCollection 2017.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
5
6
7
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
8
9
Foot orthoses in lower limb overuse conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis--critical appraisal and commentary.足部矫形器在下肢过度使用条件下的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析——批判性评价和评论。
J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):103-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.103.
10
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Foot and Ankle Care by Podiatrists and Amputations in Patients With Diabetes and Kidney Failure.足踝护理:足病医生的专业治疗与糖尿病及肾衰竭患者的截肢风险
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240801. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0801.
2
What is the Lived Experience of the 'Three Great Pathologies' of Diabetic Foot Disease? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Independent Thinking of Podiatrists in Diabetes Secondary Care.糖尿病足病“三大病理”的真实体验是什么?糖尿病二级护理中足病医生独立思维的阐释现象学分析。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221088622. doi: 10.1177/00469580221088622.
3
Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: development and validation of a prognostic model.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical interpretation of Cochran's Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity.对 Cochran's Q 检验的批判性解释取决于功效和对异质性的先验假设。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):149-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.13. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.预防糖尿病足溃疡的患者教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD001488. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001488.pub4.
3
The worldwide diabetes epidemic.全球糖尿病流行状况。
糖尿病足溃疡预防的风险评估和结构化护理干预:预测模型的制定和验证。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(62):1-198. doi: 10.3310/hta24620.
4
Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis.团队合作中足部医学治疗对糖尿病足溃疡和下肢截肢的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Mar 20;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-0380-8.
5
Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data.预防糖尿病足溃疡:RCT 数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2020 Jan;63(1):49-64. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05020-7. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.老年人糖尿病治疗:内分泌学会*临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1520-1574. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00198.
7
Comorbid depression and risk of lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病患者合并抑郁症与下肢截肢风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Aug 20;5(1):e000366. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000366. eCollection 2017.
8
Management of diabetic foot disease and amputation in the Irish health system: a qualitative study of patients' attitudes and experiences with health services.爱尔兰医疗系统中糖尿病足病的管理与截肢情况:一项关于患者对医疗服务态度和体验的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 1;15:251. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0926-9.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012 Apr;19(2):93-6. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328350583a.
4
Lower extremity amputations--a review of global variability in incidence.下肢截肢术——全球发病率变化的综述。
Diabet Med. 2011 Oct;28(10):1144-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03279.x.
5
Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病发病率与社会经济地位:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):804-18. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr029. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
6
Receipt of care and reduction of lower extremity amputations in a nationally representative sample of U.S. Elderly.美国老年人群中代表性样本中接受护理与减少下肢截肢的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 1):1740-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01157.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
7
Diabetic foot prevention: a neglected opportunity in high-risk patients.糖尿病足预防:高危患者中被忽视的机会。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1460-2. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0310. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
8
Association between glycated haemoglobin and the risk of lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus-review and meta-analysis.糖化血红蛋白与糖尿病患者下肢截肢风险的关系:综述和荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2010 May;53(5):840-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1638-7. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
9
Complex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulceration.预防糖尿病足溃疡的复杂干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007610.pub2.
10
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估医疗保健干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明:解释与详述
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.