Reznick Olga Grinstead, McCartney Kathleen, Gregorich Steven E, Zack Barry, Feaster Daniel J
Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Correct Health Care. 2013 Jul;19(3):178-93. doi: 10.1177/1078345813486442. Epub 2013 May 8.
HIV+ inmates reentering their communities are at increased risk for poor health outcomes and for transmitting HIV. This article reports on a randomized trial comparing an ecosystem-based intervention and an individually focused intervention for reducing HIV transmission risk and improving medication adherence. Reincarceration was considered as a secondary variable. Both groups decreased sexual risk behavior over the 12-month follow-up period. Unexpectedly, the ecosystem intervention group was less likely to be taking medication or to be adherent and more likely to have been reincarcerated. Failure to demonstrate a significant advantage of the ecosystem intervention may have resulted from the difficulty of engaging family and other ecosystem members in the intervention. Implications for developing and applying interventions for this population are discussed.
重新融入社区的艾滋病毒呈阳性的囚犯健康状况不佳以及传播艾滋病毒的风险增加。本文报道了一项随机试验,该试验比较了一种基于生态系统的干预措施和一种针对个人的干预措施,以降低艾滋病毒传播风险并提高药物依从性。再次入狱被视为一个次要变量。在12个月的随访期内,两组的性风险行为均有所减少。出乎意料的是,生态系统干预组服用药物或坚持服药的可能性较小,再次入狱的可能性更大。未能证明生态系统干预的显著优势可能是由于让家庭和其他生态系统成员参与干预存在困难。文中讨论了针对这一人群制定和应用干预措施的意义。