Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):637-53. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 7.
Hypnotic responding might be due to attenuated frontal lobe functioning after the hypnotic induction. Little is known about whether personality traits linked with frontal functioning are associated with responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions. We assessed whether hypnotic suggestibility is related to the traits of self-control and impulsivity in 154 participants who completed the Brief Self-Control Scale, the Self-Regulation Scale, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), and the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS:A). BIS-11 non-planning impulsivity correlated positively with HGSHS:A (Bonferroni-corrected). Furthermore, in the best model emerging from a stepwise multiple regression, both non-planning impulsivity and self-control positively predicted hypnotic suggestibility, and there was an interaction of BIS-11 motor impulsivity with gender. For men only, motor impulsivity tended to predict hypnotic suggestibility. Hypnotic suggestibility is associated with personality traits linked with frontal functioning, and hypnotic responding in men and women might differ.
催眠反应可能是由于催眠诱导后额叶功能减弱所致。目前尚不清楚与额叶功能相关的人格特质是否与对催眠暗示的反应有关。我们评估了 154 名参与者的自我控制特质和冲动特质是否与催眠暗示的可接受性有关，这些参与者完成了简短的自我控制量表、自我调节量表、巴瑞特冲动量表（BIS-11）和哈佛群体催眠易感性量表（HGSHS:A）。BIS-11 无计划冲动与 HGSHS:A 呈正相关（经 Bonferroni 校正）。此外，在逐步多元回归中出现的最佳模型中，无计划冲动和自我控制均正向预测催眠暗示性，BIS-11 运动冲动与性别存在交互作用。仅对于男性，运动冲动倾向于预测催眠暗示性。催眠暗示性与与额叶功能相关的人格特质有关，并且男性和女性的催眠反应可能不同。
