两位寻求矛盾之处的哲学家：对辛格和库舍的回应
Two philosophers in search of a contradiction: a response to Singer and Kuhse.
作者信息
Long T A
机构信息
University of Cincinnati.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1990 Jun;16(2):95-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.2.95.
Abstract
Peter Singer and Helga Kuhse reject my claim that because their views on the mortality of infanticide are metaphysically incommensurate with those of Paul Ramsey they cannot refute his position. According to them, I have failed to see that Ramsey contradicts himself. Once this is seen, no further refutation is needed. I argue that there is no contradiction and offer further thoughts on the metaphysically incommensurate.
摘要
彼得·辛格和赫尔加·库舍驳斥了我的观点，即由于他们关于杀婴的道德观念在形而上学层面上与保罗·拉姆齐的观念不可通约，所以他们无法反驳他的立场。在他们看来，我没有认识到拉姆齐自相矛盾。一旦认识到这一点，就无需进一步反驳了。我认为不存在矛盾，并对形而上学层面的不可通约性提出了进一步思考。
相似文献
1
Two philosophers in search of a contradiction: a response to Singer and Kuhse.两位寻求矛盾之处的哲学家：对辛格和库舍的回应
J Med Ethics. 1990 Jun;16(2):95-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.2.95.
2
Kuhse, Singer and slippery slopes.库塞、辛格与滑坡论证。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Sep;14(3):132-4, 147. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.3.132.
3
Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long.解决关于生命神圣性的争论：对朗的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):198-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.198.
4
Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute.杀害残疾婴儿：有时这是一场形而上学的争论。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Jun;14(2):79-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.2.79.
5
Euthanasia and John Paul II's "silent language of profound sharing of affection:" why Christians should care about Peter Singer.安乐死与约翰·保罗二世的“深情分享的无声语言”：为何基督徒应当关注彼得·辛格。
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Dec;7(3):359-78. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.3.359.6881.
6
Singer, preference utilitarianism and infanticide.辛格、偏好功利主义与杀婴行为。
Stud Christ Ethics. 1999;12(2):47-73. doi: 10.1177/095394689901200204.
7
More on euthanasia: a response to Pauer-Studer.更多关于安乐死：对保尔-施图德的回应。
Monist. 1993 Apr;76(2):158-74.
8
Infanticide for the handicapped newborn--a secular rejection.对残疾新生儿实施杀婴行为——一种世俗的摒弃。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):223. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.223.
9
James Rachels and the active euthanasia debate.詹姆斯·雷切尔斯与主动安乐死辩论
J Evang Theol Soc. 1988 Mar;31(1):81-90.
10
Euthanasia, letting die and the pause.安乐死、听任死亡与暂停治疗
J Med Ethics. 1988 Jun;14(2):61-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.2.61.
引用本文的文献
1
Prolonging dying is the same as prolonging living--one more response to Long.延长死亡过程与延长生命过程一样——这是对朗的又一种回应。
J Med Ethics. 1991 Dec;17(4):205-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.4.205.
本文引用的文献
1
Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long.解决关于生命神圣性的争论：对朗的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):198-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.198.
2
Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute.杀害残疾婴儿：有时这是一场形而上学的争论。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Jun;14(2):79-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.2.79.
Zotero 插件