Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY.
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1684-703. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12064. Epub 2013 May 13.
To determine whether outcome disparities between black and white trauma patients have decreased over the last 10 years.
Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study.
We performed an observational cohort study on 191,887 patients admitted to 28 Level 1 and Level II trauma centers. The main outcomes of interest were (1) death, (2) death or major complication, and (3) failure-to-rescue. Hospitals were categorized according to the proportion of black patients. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate trends in racial disparities and to assess whether the source of racial disparities was within or between hospitals.
Trauma patients admitted to hospitals with high concentrations of blacks (>20 percent) had a 45 percent higher odds of death (adj OR: 1.45, 95 percent CI: 1.09-1.92) and a 73 percent higher odds of death or major complication (adj OR: 1.73, 95 percent CI: 1.42-2.11) compared with patients admitted to hospitals treating low proportions of blacks. Blacks and whites admitted to the same hospitals had no difference in mortality (adj OR: 1.05, 95 percent CI: 0.87, 1.27) or death or major complications (adj OR: 1.01; 95 percent CI: 0.90, 1.13). The odds of overall mortality, and death or major complications have been reduced by 32 percent (adj OR: 0.68; 95 percent CI: 0.54-0.86) and 28 percent (adj OR: 0.72; 95 percent CI: 0.60-0.85) between 2000 and 2009, respectively. Racial disparities did not change over 10 years.
Despite the overall improvement in outcomes, the gap in quality of care between black and white trauma patients in Pennsylvania has not narrowed over the last 10 years. Racial disparities in trauma are due to the fact that black patients are more likely to be treated in lower quality hospitals compared with whites.
确定在过去 10 年中,黑人和白人创伤患者的结局差异是否有所缩小。
宾夕法尼亚创伤结局研究。
我们对 28 家 1 级和 2 级创伤中心收治的 191887 名患者进行了观察性队列研究。主要观察结果为:(1)死亡,(2)死亡或主要并发症,以及(3)抢救失败。医院按黑人患者比例进行分类。使用多变量回归模型来估计种族差异的趋势,并评估种族差异的来源是在医院内部还是医院之间。
与收治低比例黑人患者的医院相比,收治黑人患者比例较高(>20%)的医院的创伤患者死亡的可能性高 45%(调整后的优势比:1.45,95%置信区间:1.09-1.92),死亡或主要并发症的可能性高 73%(调整后的优势比:1.73,95%置信区间:1.42-2.11)。在同一医院接受治疗的黑人和白人患者在死亡率(调整后的优势比:1.05,95%置信区间:0.87,1.27)或死亡或主要并发症(调整后的优势比:1.01;95%置信区间:0.90,1.13)方面没有差异。总的死亡率和死亡或主要并发症的可能性分别降低了 32%(调整后的优势比:0.68;95%置信区间:0.54-0.86)和 28%(调整后的优势比:0.72;95%置信区间:0.60-0.85),分别在 2000 年至 2009 年之间。10 年来,种族差异没有变化。
尽管整体预后有所改善,但在过去 10 年中,宾夕法尼亚州黑人和白人创伤患者之间的护理质量差距并未缩小。创伤中的种族差异是由于与白人相比,黑人患者更有可能在质量较低的医院接受治疗。