Suppr超能文献

昆士兰州人类感染 Q 热的潜在动物和环境来源。

Potential animal and environmental sources of Q fever infection for humans in Queensland.

机构信息

Queensland Paediatric Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Children's Health Queensland Hospitals and Health Service , The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Mar;61(2):105-12. doi: 10.1111/zph.12051. Epub 2013 May 10.

Abstract

Q fever is a vaccine-preventable disease; despite this, high annual notification numbers are still recorded in Australia. We have previously shown seroprevalence in Queensland metropolitan regions is approaching that of rural areas. This study investigated the presence of nucleic acid from Coxiella burnetii, the agent responsible for Q fever, in a number of animal and environmental samples collected throughout Queensland, to identify potential sources of human infection. Samples were collected from 129 geographical locations and included urine, faeces and whole blood from 22 different animal species; 45 ticks were removed from two species, canines and possums; 151 soil samples; 72 atmospheric dust samples collected from two locations and 50 dust swabs collected from domestic vacuum cleaners. PCR testing was performed targeting the IS1111 and COM1 genes for the specific detection of C. burnetii DNA. There were 85 detections from 1318 animal samples, giving a detection rate for each sample type ranging from 2.1 to 6.8%. Equine samples produced a detection rate of 11.9%, whilst feline and canine samples showed detection rates of 7.8% and 5.2%, respectively. Native animals had varying detection rates: pooled urines from flying foxes had 7.8%, whilst koalas had 5.1%, and 6.7% of ticks screened were positive. The soil and dust samples showed the presence of C. burnetii DNA ranging from 2.0 to 6.9%, respectively. These data show that specimens from a variety of animal species and the general environment provide a number of potential sources for C. burnetii infections of humans living in Queensland. These previously unrecognized sources may account for the high seroprevalence rates seen in putative low-risk communities, including Q fever patients with no direct animal contact and those subjects living in a low-risk urban environment.

摘要

Q 热是一种可通过疫苗预防的疾病;尽管如此,在澳大利亚,每年仍有大量病例被报告。我们之前的研究显示,昆士兰州大都市地区的血清流行率正接近农村地区。本研究调查了在整个昆士兰州采集的多种动物和环境样本中,导致 Q 热的贝纳柯克斯体的核酸的存在情况,以确定人类感染的潜在来源。从 22 个不同动物物种采集了 129 个地理位置的尿液、粪便和全血样本;从犬科动物和负鼠身上采集了 45 只蜱;采集了 151 个土壤样本;从两个地点采集了 72 个大气尘样本,从家用真空吸尘器上采集了 50 个灰尘拭子。使用针对 IS1111 和 COM1 基因的 PCR 检测方法对 Coxiella burnetii DNA 进行了特异性检测。从 1318 个动物样本中检测到 85 个样本,每种样本类型的检测率为 2.1%至 6.8%。马科动物样本的检测率为 11.9%,而猫科和犬科动物样本的检测率分别为 7.8%和 5.2%。本地动物的检测率各不相同:从果蝠混合尿液中检测到 7.8%,而考拉为 5.1%,筛选出的 6.7%的蜱为阳性。土壤和灰尘样本的 Coxiella burnetii DNA 检测率分别为 2.0%至 6.9%。这些数据表明,来自多种动物物种和一般环境的样本为生活在昆士兰州的人类提供了许多潜在的感染源。这些以前未被识别的来源可能解释了在所谓低风险社区中看到的高血清流行率,包括没有直接动物接触的 Q 热患者和生活在低风险城市环境中的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验